You will begin developing the 5.18 Plan Risk Management document for your Capstone Project. This key project planning artifact will be developed over the course of several modules. For this first assignment you will use the Plan Risk Management Template and develop the content for Sections 1.1 Purpose of the Risk management Plan, 2.1 Process, 2.2 Risk Identification, 2.3 Risk Analysis to include sub sections 2.3.1 and 2.3.2.
Capstone Project Deliverables (2) (1)
Capstone Project Deliverables (2) (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall:
Format and use of graphics
25 pts
Excellent
Proper format for Memo or Cover Sheet, with name, date, assignment title, course and section. Record of Changes is included and updated. Table of Contents are included and accurate. No identified misstatements, errors, or inaccuracies are identified. Prescribed format is followed. Tables and graphs are correctly labeled and cited.
20 pts
Good
Report substantially follows the Excellent criteria with minor exceptions.
15 pts
Major Flaws
Report does not meet professional criteria. Two or more major deviations from Excellent criteria.
10 pts
Severe Deficiency
Incomplete, inaccurate or major issues with unreferenced content. Incomplete report.
0 pts
No Marks
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent:
Accuracy and completeness
25 pts
Excellent
All PMBOK areas applicable to each deliverable were addressed. EEFs, OPAs and information are appropriately sourced. Deliverable or assignment submission substantively addresses the objectives or questions posed.
20 pts
Good
Minor errors with the presentation of data, charts or graphs. For example, graphs are not correctly labeled or misleading.
15 pts
Major Flaws
Major errors with content, presentation of data, charts or graphs.
10 pts
Severe Deficiency
Significant portions of content, data, charts or graphs missing.
0 pts
No Marks
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConformance to PMBOK:
25 pts
Excellent
Assignment conforms completely to PMBOK guidelines.
20 pts
Good
Two or fewer identifiable areas were not addressed in conformance with the PMBOK.
15 pts
Major Flaws
Three or more areas or responses were not addressed in conformance with the PMBOK.
10 pts
Severe Deficiency
Major portions of the assignment did not follow PMBOK guidelines.
0 pts
No Marks
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Readability:
Includes the following:
Organization | Correct use of terms | Integration and readability | Grammar | Citation of appendices and references
25 pts
Excellent
Written work conforms substantially to professional guidelines, and is well organized and easily understood. | Terms are correctly used in the context of the assignment, the PMBOK, and referenced industry standards. | Professional wording and phrases are used. The writing style and use of verb tense (past, present, future) are correct throughout the document. The document is readable, easily and logically understood, from the beginning to the end. | Error free. The document has been thoroughly spell-checked and proofread. | Proper citation of references and appendices. References were cited correctly in the text. Information was appropriately placed in either the main text or in an appendix.
20 pts
Good
The organization of the document is clearly evident, but the logical order of up to two parts was determined to be out of place. | Up to two terms were used without definition or out of context. | There were some indications of multiple trains of thought and sources (e.g. different fonts, different phraseology, different tense, etc.) | There were less than five (5) spelling and/or grammatical errors. | Information was appropriately placed in the main text or an appendix. Less than two citations in the text were incomplete or incorrect.
15 pts
Major Flaws
The organization was unclear and the document is difficult to read and understand. | Three or more terms were used undefined or out of context. | There was ample indication of lapses of thought and context. Assignment was difficult to read. | There were more than five (5) spelling and grammatical errors. | Misplacement of information in the text or the appendices. Three or more appendices were poorly documented and/or referenced in the document.
10 pts
Severe Deficiency
The report was disorganized to the extent that it prevents understanding of the content. | Terms were used without definition to the extent that understanding of multiple passages was inhibited. | The document contains different writing styles, margins, fonts, and styles. | There were frequent misspelled words, and obvious repeated grammatical and spelling errors, indicating that effort was not taken to spell-check and proofread the document. | Considerable amount of material was misplaced. Appendices were not documented or referenced in the text.
0 pts
No Marks
25 pts
Total Points: 100
