You may use the attached chart to help answer one of the following questions, but make sure to add at least 3 other sources.
1. Why is Germany so successful at international trade?
What has happened economically in China during the past twenty-five years?
Your case study should be at least 400 words with at least three sources; one MUST be your text.
All written work must be done in proper APA format.
Rubric
Case Study (LO-7)
Case Study (LO-7)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper follows the guidelines and covers all of the requirements of the assignment
10 pts
Exceptional – Paper focuses on the topic and does not stray from the central theme. Great insight using strong comparisons and course concepts.
8 pts
Achieving – Mostly on topic Some minor variance of theme. Good comparisons of style. Uses course concepts well.
7 pts
Progressing – Does not fully support the topic. A few vague comparison were made; mostly on leader and not the other. Little insight Into couse concepts.
5 pts
Developing – MIsses the point completely. No camparisions were made and no substance. Relied on just restating the question.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic supports the required amount of reliable research using proper APA format
10 pts
Exceptional – Exceeds the minimum number of research sources. All sources are highly reliable, include some Peer Review articles. APA is excellent
8 pts
Achieving – Meets the minimum number of sources all of which are reliable and credible. APA is mostly good.
7 pts
Progressing – Does not include the required number of reliable sources or the sources used are not deemed to be acceptable. APA needs improvement.
5 pts
Developing – Little or no research or none of the sources used are of acceptable quality. Poor APA or none at all.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper ties in course concepts. Uses information presented in class and/or in the textbook.
10 pts
Exceptional – Uses at least 3 course concepts which are clearly identifiably as being part of the curriculum
8 pts
Achieving – Uses at least 2 course concepts which are clearly identifiably as being part of the curcullum
7 pts
Progressing – Uses at least 1 course concept which are clearly identifably as being part of the curriculum.
5 pts
Developing – Course concepts are not exhibited in the paper,
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStudent identifies the real problem in the case and proposes solutions to solve the problem.
10 pts
Exceptional – Identifies a major issue and at least one minor issue. Proposes workable solutions for both.
8 pts
Achieving – Identifies a major issue and suggests a solution.
7 pts
Progressing – Eludes to the major issue but does not clearly identify it. Proposes no solution.
5 pts
Developing – Does not identily the major issue.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting quality
10 pts
Exceptional – Very well written and well organized . Identifies and emphasizes all important points. No spelling or grammar errors.
8 pts
Achieving – Well written and somewhat organized. Most of the important points are addressed. No spelling or grammar errors.
7 pts
Progressing – Weak organization. Some spelling and/or grammar errors. Missed some important points.
5 pts
Developing – Poorly written and poorly organized. Many spelling and grammar errors.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLO7 – Formulate global strategies
Formulate global strategies for existing multinational corporations.
threshold: 8.0 pts
10 pts
Exceptional
8 pts
Achieving
7 pts
Progressing
5 pts
Developing
—
Total Points: 50
