-subject is 49001 Judgment and Decision Making Assessment task
-The writer must be an engineering major with knowledge of Judgment and Decision Making
-It is (very important) to look at the word Criteria sheet file (attached) step by step (very important).
-(be careful) about plagiarism and similarity-Turnitin can only indicate where and when a text appears similar to another text.
-Abstract assignment (Type: Report)
-Length: Total assignment length = 1,800 words. Each abstract: 300 words. Each experience: 150 words. (4 x 300) + (4 x 150) = 1,800 words.
-The word limit for each individual component must not be exceeded by more than 10%. Accordingly, each abstract must be no more than 330 words followed by an experience example of no more than 165 words. Words beyond this limit will not be marked.
-Task:
-1. Abstract. (4 marks each) [4 marks x 4 abstracts] Write an abstract of 300 words for the four (4) nominated readings in the Reading Material and Exercises book (RM&E). The nominated readings for the current study session are listed below. Marks are awarded for the relevance and depth of insight expressed, and the linkage to the key aspects of the Management Setting
-2. Experience. (3 marks each) [3 marks x 4 abstracts] Under each of the four (4) abstracts, write a 150 word example of how each reading relates to your work experience, or how they could relate to an imaginary work situation. Students who do not have any relevant work experience may base the “experience” components on their personal life experience. Marks are awarded for the relevance of the experience to the insights articulated in the abstract, and the clarity of description of the experience.
-3. Report professionalism and communication. (2 marks) The report should be written as if meant for a professional audience and not just as an attempt to satisfy an academic course requirement. Marks are awarded for communicating clearly, exhibiting attention to detail and presenting itself to a high standard, including:
-• Good document structure including:
-o Title page (student name/number, tutor name, tutorial number, title,submission date).
-o Report Heading.
-o Numbered headings for each section.
-o Reference list page.
-o Additional appendices (if needed).
-o Report should have numbered pages and good English expression
-(including punctuation and spelling).
-o FEIT cover sheet should be included at the front of the submission.
-• Clarity and insight – suitable word count (not counting title page, headings,
-reference list, etc.), deals properly with each topic without verbosity, shows a depth of analysis.
-• Appropriate use of quotes (where applicable). All references should be noted
-in the reference list at the end of your report and employ correct UTS format
-To summarise, you are to submit:
– • reading 1 abstract + example; and
– • reading 2 abstract + example; and
– • reading 3 abstract + example; and
– • reading 4 abstract + example.
-A feature of the assignment is the requirement of strict compliance with the word limits, each component has a word count tolerance of plus 10%. See Length (above).
Nominated readings are: from book (The Reading Material and Exercises (RM&E)):
(The book has been attached)
1. Reading 1.1, March J.G. (1994) Chapter 2 (part), ‘Rule following’, in A Primer on Decision Making, The Free Press, NY (RM&E start from PAGE 7)
2. Reading 4.3, Wildavsky, A. and Dake, K. (1990), ‘Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why?’, Daedalus, 119(4). (RM&E start from PAGE 147)
3. Reading 6.3, Green, R.M. (1984), ‘Neutral, Omnipartial rule-making’, in Green, R.M., The Ethical Manager, Macmillan (RM&E start from PAGE 265)
4. Reading 8.1, Linstone, H. (1984), ‘Our proposed perspectives’ in Linstone, H., Multiple Perspectives for Decision Making, North Holland, NY (RM&E start from PAGE 361)
-Referencing Standards
All material derived from other works must be acknowledged and referenced appropriately using the Harvard UTS referencing style. : https://www.lib.uts.edu.au/referencing/harvard-uts.
