Write an 2000-word analytical argumentative essay which either argues for a particular position on an issue on Abortion and the controversy around it and how health care workers such as , Nurses , Doctors, and Pharmacist go against the rules of their workplace and not give support and a morally right conversation with their patients about contraceptives and other medical care that involves terminating a fetus just because of their moral beliefs. The article I would like to add in my paper is “The Limits of Conscientious Objection — May Pharmacists Refuse to Fill Prescriptions for Emergency Contraception?” , “A Defense of Abortion Author(s): Judith Jarvis Thomson” , include the articles Baker, R. (2014). Against anonymity.
Bioethics, 28
(4), 166-169. doi:10.1111/bioe.12093
Brock, D. W. (2008).
Conscientious refusal by physicians and pharmacists: Who is obligated to
do what, and why?
Springer Science and Business Media LLC. doi:10.1007/s11017-008-
9076-y
Cantor-conscience[4213]
(2006).
Delston, J. B. (2017).
When doctors deny drugs: Sexism and contraception access in the medical
field
Wiley. doi:10.1111/bioe.12373
Matthew K. Wynia,. (November 18 , 19 9 9). “Medical professionalism in society” .
Volume 3
41
(November 21), 1612-1616.
Princeton university press
The ethics of abortion : When does life begin?
Steve Taylor (Director). (2019, Leicester, England :
Shortcuts TV, .).[Video/DVD] Retrieved from ShortCutsTV (Producer), & . (2019). The Ethics
of Abortion: When Does Life Begin?? [Video/DVD] ShortCutsTV. Retrieved from https://0-
video.alexanderstreet.com.pacificatclassic.pacific.edu/watch/the-ethics-of-abortion-when-
does-life-begin
Do not write an extensive summary of them., utilize points made by the authors to develop your own analysis. As part of your argument, you should anticipate objections that critics of your position might make. The paper should have a clear thesis and logical format. The essay grade will be based on the following criteria:
A
Demonstrates insightful engagement with topic; has sharp focus; provides relevant and sufficient evidence to support argument; uses appropriate sources; is well-structured and well-organized; is stylistically sound and virtually free of any mechanical errors (e.g., punctuation and spelling); and uses proper citations. The bibliography is complete and has proper citations.
B
Demonstrates engagement with topic with some insight; has solid focus; provides solid evidence to support argument; uses appropriate sources; has good structure and organization with only minor problems; is stylistically and mechanically solid with only a few mechanical errors; and uses proper citations. The bibliography is complete and has proper citations, although there may be some minor format errors.
C
Demonstrates some engagement with topic but with little depth or insight; has intelligible ideas but focus may lack some clarity; provides some evidence to support argument, but it may be weak, inaccurate, or irrelevant; uses appropriate sources; has mostly coherent structure and organization, although with some unclear aspects; contains many stylistic and mechanical errors (perhaps indicating a lack of proof-reading); and citations have some formatting errors. The bibliography is complete, but the citations are incomplete or with serious format errors.
D
Minimal engagement with topic; lacks clear focus; provides little-to-no evidence to support argument; some, but insufficient, use of appropriate resources; poorly organized; contains many serious stylistic and mechanical errors (no evidence of proof-reading); citations are incomplete and/or have serious formatting errors. The bibliography is incomplete (needs to do more research), and citations are incomplete and/or with serious format errors.
F
Even worse performance and/or fails to complete key aspects of the assignment (e.g., does not address topic, does not utilize course material and/or outside scholarly sources, falls short of the length requirement, fails to cite sources, and does not submit bibliography).
