W2: Conceptual Framework
Bradley Grigsby
In the realm of social sciences, the debate over the scientific nature of research is nuanced and multifaceted. The degree to which research within the social sciences can be considered “scientific” hinges on several key aspects. Firstly, scientific research in social sciences involves the systematic gathering, analysis, and interpretation of empirical evidence. This evidence is rigorously examined through established methods and frameworks to draw valid conclusions about social phenomena (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2013). A line of research is deemed scientific when it adheres to certain principles: objectivity, which aims to minimize biases in data collection and interpretation; replicability, allowing others to reproduce findings under similar conditions; and falsifiability, meaning that hypotheses and theories can be tested and potentially disproven through empirical evidence (Clauser, 2008).
However, conducting scientific research in social sciences presents several challenges. One significant challenge is the complexity and variability of human behavior and societal dynamics, which can be difficult to measure and predict accurately. This challenge is compounded by ethical considerations, such as ensuring informed consent and protecting participant confidentiality, which are crucial yet can sometimes limit the scope or methods of research (Whittemore & Melkus, n.d.). Moreover, the context-bound nature of social phenomena means that generalizing findings beyond specific populations or settings requires careful consideration and validation. The diversity of perspectives and interpretations within the social sciences also contributes to debates about the validity and applicability of research findings across different contexts (Turner, n.d.).
Concluding, while social science research aims to be scientific by employing systematic methods and empirical evidence, its scientific nature is shaped by the complexities of human behavior, ethical considerations, and the challenges of generalizability. Researchers in social sciences must navigate these challenges to produce credible and meaningful contributions to knowledge that can inform policies and practices in various societal domains.
References
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing Research Questions: Doing Interesting Research. Sage. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446270035
Clauser, J. (2008). “Types of inquiry and the nature of proof”. In J. Goldman (Ed.), An Introduction to Intelligence Research and Analysis 38-50. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
Whittemore, R., & Melkus, G. (n.d.). “Design decisions in research”. In e-Source: Behavioral & Social Sciences Research 1-23. Retrieved from http://www.esourceresearch.org/eSourceBook/DesignDecisionsinResearch/1LearningObjectives/tabid/662/Default.aspx
Turner, S. (n.d.). “Theory development”. In e-Source: Behavioral & Social Sciences Research 1-22. Retrieved from http://www.esourceresearch.org/eSourceBook/TheoryDevelopment/17AuthorBiography/tabid/303/Default.aspx
