two questions,
Q1: Assess
the strengths and weaknesses of different recruitment and selection methods to
build effective workforces (AC 2.4). You must assess advertising vacancies
on organisation websites and interview applicants. Then, provide one
more example for recruitment methods and another for selection methods.
Short references should be added to your narrative below. Please only list
your long references in the box provided at this section’s end. Word
count: Approximately 275 words.
please make sure to see below the comments from my last submission:
2nd Assessor comments: This assessment is still not sufficient, Abdulaziz. You were not asked to start again – you were asked to explain how each example helps build effective workforces – this has still not been done. 1 recent, appropriate source supports your narrative.
For your resubmission:
For each method, add a brief explanation of how they help build effective workforces.
Do NOT remove any of the previous narrative. We MUST be able to see your previous submission work.
Please use blue font for submission 3
For narrative you want ignored, please show this by using the strikethrough key so the text appears like this.
Narrative that shows as strike through will not contribute to your overall word count and will not be assessed
Please note you only have 1 more submission available. If you do not achieve a pass on your next submission you will be required to complete a whole new assignment set by the CIPD. You must read the feedback carefully and make sure you make all the required revisions.
Q2: Evaluate
approaches that an organisation can take to build and support different talent
pools (AC 3.3)
Short references should be added to your narrative below. Please only list
your long references in the box provided at this section’s end. Word
count: Approximately 275 words
2nd Assessor comments: We can accept your evaluation of collaborating with educational institutions, however, there is not a clear evaluation of an approach that an organisation can take to support talent pools. Appropriate sources have been cited.
For your resubmission:
Keep your paragraph about collaborating with educational institutions.
Strike-through the rest.
Identify 1 approach for supporting talent pools (e.g. regular communication).
Evaluate it – what are its advantages and limitations?
Ensure that recent, appropriate sources support your revised narrative.
Do NOT remove any of the previous narrative. We MUST be able to see your previous submission work.
Please use blue font for submission 3
For narrative you want ignored, please show this by using the strikethrough key so the text appears like this.
Narrative that shows as strike through will not contribute to your overall word count and will not be assessed
Please note you only have 1 more submission available. If you do not achieve a pass on your next submission you will be required to complete a whole new assignment set by the CIPD. You must read the feedback carefully and make sure you make all the required revisions.
i attached the assignment DOC file along with the assignment writing guide.
please let me know if you need any clarification.
