This is the instructions for the assignment and attached yoy will see the template. Any questions do no hesitate to reach me out.
Signature assignment instructions as follows:
Choose a body system alteration covered during the course or a patient from your clinical site. Develop a case scenario that include Pathophysiology of the client’s disease process and the nursing care plan focused on disease prevention and health promotion strategies utilizing evidence-based interventions. After completing the assessment and collecting subjective and objective data develop the nursing diagnosis and plan of care along with the goals, outcomes and interventions including patient teaching on disease, treatment plan and prevention of complications. Be ready to present in class. See template care plan and rubric in the course document.
Important:
1. Include 3 references within the last 5 years and in APA style 7th edition.
2. Turnitin Report must be equal to or lower than 20%. Having a Turnitin report higher than 20% will represent a 0 in the assignment.
Rubric for Signature Assignment MSN5410
CATEGORY
4 (100%)
3(80%)
2 (60%)
1 (0%)
Points
Assessment (30%)
30
Included health assessment, subjective and objective data, current labs and diagnostic test results, current medications. Case scenario well developed that included Pathophysiology of the client’s disease process.
24
Included health assessment, subjective and objective data, current labs and diagnostic test results, current medications or Case scenario well developed that included Pathophysiology of the client’s disease process.
18
Included health assessment, subjective and objective data, or current labs and diagnostic test results or current medications or Case scenario well developed that didn’t include Pathophysiology of the client’s disease process.
0
Didn’t not Include health assessment or subjective and/or objective data, current labs and diagnostic test results or current medications and Case scenario poorly developed that didn’t include Pathophysiology of the client’s disease process.
/30
Nursing Diagnosis (20%)
20
Prioritized NANDA diagnosis and rationale utilizing the complete format (label, related to, evidenced by)
16
Prioritized NANDA diagnosis and rationale but, failed to utilize the complete format (label, related to, evidenced by)
12
Prioritized NANDA diagnosis but, failed to include the rationale or utilizing the complete format (label, related to, evidenced by)
0
Didn’t use prioritized NANDA diagnosis and rationale and not utilize the complete format (label, related to, evidenced by)
/20
Plan of care (10%)
10
Developed short- and long-term goals with measurable expected outcomes from the nursing diagnosis
8
Developed short- or long-term goals without measurable expected outcomes from the nursing diagnosis
6
Developed short- and long-term goals without measurable expected outcomes from the nursing diagnosis.
0
Failure to developed short- and long-term goals, and without measurable expected outcomes from the nursing diagnosis
/10
Intervention (20%)
20
Nursing intervention states action, frequency and person who is going to carry this out. Rationale for actions stated and referenced (APA)
16
Nursing intervention states action, frequency and person who is going to carry this out. Failed to include rationale for actions stated or references (APA)
12
Nursing intervention states action, frequency and person who is going to carry this out. Failed to include rationale for actions stated and references (APA)
0
Missing nursing intervention action, frequency and person who is going to carry this out. Failed to include rationale for actions stated or references (APA)
/20
Evaluation
(10%)
10
Stated whether the expected outcome is met or not met. Including the evaluation parameter or criteria. Includes revision and/or new evaluation.
8
Stated whether the expected outcome is met or not met. Including the evaluation parameter or criteria. Missing the revision and/or new evaluation
6
Stated whether the expected outcome is met or not met. Did not Include the evaluation parameter or criteria or missing the revision and/or new evaluation
0
Didn’t State whether the expected outcome is met or not met. Did not include the evaluation parameter or criteria and missing the revision and/or new evaluation
/10
Presentation
(10%)
10
Clear articulation, proper volume. Proper use of the terminology and the language. Showing confidence and answering the audience question demonstrating knowledge in the topic presented
8
Clear articulation, proper volume. Proper use of the terminology and the language. Showing lack of confidence or having difficulties answering the audience question demonstrating knowledge in the topic presented
6
Clear articulation, proper volume. Problems using the terminology and the language. Showing lack of confidence or having difficulties answering the audience question demonstrating knowledge in the topic presented
0
Too loud or inaudible. Problems using the terminology and the language. Showing lack of confidence and having difficulties answering the audience question demonstrating knowledge in the topic presented
/10
