The
purpose of this assignment is to develop a strong, working foundation
for your final paper. You will identify a topic area and develop a
problem- or issue-related topic within that area of interest. As you
develop this specific topic, keep in mind that your eventual goal is to
formulate and present a solution to the healthcare issue or problem you identify.
Your topic proposal should include the following items and address the following:
Describe the topic you wish to pursue.
It may be somewhat broad at this point and it may imply a
problem. Use the Additional Resources in your course materials to help
you search for ideas.
Identify your purpose: Why are you interested in this topic? (Narrow your topic.)
Specifically explain what it is that fascinates you or draws you to this topic.
Clearly describe the topic’s relevance in the field today.
Identify a purpose for a paper on this topic:
What might you accomplish in exploring this problem?
What is your intended goal?
To evoke change
To make new connections (new cause and effect)
To introduce a new theory, solution, or idea
Is this goal realistic?
Identify a problem within the topic and draft a problem
statement. (It will likely evolve and be revised as you progress through
your research.)
Identify a problem related to your topic and state it.
The problem statement should be specific and indicate the focus of your final paper.
Not too narrow, not too broad
Intellectually challenging (a simple solution is not apparent)
Who would benefit from a solution to this problem (who is the target population)?
Your paper should be 1–2 pages. Adhere to APA Style throughout.
Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.
Points: 70
Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Rubric
General Education Standardized Rubric: Week 1 Topic Assignment
General Education Standardized Rubric: Week 1 Topic Assignment
Criteria Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Topic
28
to >24.92 pts
Exceeds Expectations
An
appropriately narrow, unique topic is clearly identified. The writer
identifies an audience in detail and clearly explains why the topic is
appropriate for that audience.
24.92
to >20.16 pts
Meets Expectations
A
topic is clearly identified but may be too broad, too narrow, or lack
originality. The writer identifies an audience and explains why the
topic is appropriate for that audience.
20.16
to >16.52 pts
Approaches Expectations
A
topic is identified but is too broad, too narrow, or unclear. The
writer identifies an audience but is unclear on why the topic is
appropriate for that audience.
16.52
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
A
topic is not clearly identified. The writer fails to identify an
audience or explain why the topic is appropriate for that audience.
28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Thesis Statement
28
to >24.92 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Thesis
statement provides a clear, compelling argument on an appropriate topic
with a thoughtful approach that is clear and concise but not too
simplistic. It is clear that initial research has begun.
24.92
to >20.16 pts
Meets Expectations
Thesis
statement provides an argument on an appropriate topic. The thesis
indicates a general approach to the topic and may need refining.
20.16
to >16.52 pts
Approaches Expectations
Presents a thesis statement but lacks a thoughtful exploration on the topic.
16.52
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The thesis statement is missing or lacks any exploration on the topic.
28 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Writing Mechanics
7
to >6.23 pts
Exceeds Expectations
The
writing demonstrates sophisticated clarity and conciseness and is
extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are
all correct with minimal to no errors.
6.23
to >5.04 pts
Meets Expectations
The writing is clear, concise, and well organized. May contain a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors.
5.04
to >4.13 pts
Approaches Expectations
The
writing lacks clarity, conciseness, or organization. Several errors in
punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability
of the paper.
4.13
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The
writing is unfocused and poorly organized. Many errors in punctuation,
spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Sources and APA Formatting
7
to >6.23 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Uses
APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources without errors.
Meets length and formatting requirements of the assignment. The required
number of relevant audience-appropriate sources have been expertly
cited and integrated into the content to support ideas.
6.23
to >5.04 pts
Meets Expectations
APA
Style is used with few citation errors. Meets most length and
formatting requirements of the assignment. Reputable
audience-appropriate sources have been included but may not be well
integrated. The source content minimally supports ideas.
5.04
to >4.13 pts
Approaches Expectations
Reflects
incomplete knowledge of APA Style with many errors. Meets few length
and formatting requirements of the assignment. At least one source is
used but is not cited properly, is not reputable, or is inappropriate
for the audience or topic. The source does not support ideas.
4.13
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does
not use APA style; there are pervasive errors throughout the paper.
Does not meet length or formatting requirements of the assignment.
Sources are not provided.
7 pts
Total Points:
70
