The topic is A.I Legislation. The problem is lack of legislation as it relates to a.i. come up with a solutions such as laws, code of conduct, and more. You are basically providing an abstract, introduction and background information regarding the paper. You will also use 8 sources. The paper is 8 pages 1.5pt font arial. If possible quote me for both 5 pages and 9 pages so I can pick between the two.
Choose 8-10 of the best references you’ve identified during your literature research during the semester to prepare a literature review. Take insights identified during the annotated bibliograph as a basis to build your Literature Review. Use examples, lecture notes, communication context planning (discussion & grid/matrix) and class presentations to develop content for the main body of the communication. The key feature of a Literature Review is the organization and comprehensive analysis of the set of references as a whole. An analysis of the individual articles is not sufficient, however. A Literature Review requires an analysis placed in the context of the entire body of articles read (the synthesis element).
Requirements
The following elements are required (the entire document must be consistent with current APA formatting requirements):
APA Formatted Title Page
Abstract Page (do not exceed 250 words/include keywords)
Main Body Sections: Introduction, Body, Conclusion
Subheadings may be used in the Body section, see Chapter 16 for guidelines for use of headings/subheadings
APA Formatted Reference Page: All references listed must be cited in the body of the literature review and all citations in the body of the literature review must be listed on the reference page.
Additional Requirements
Font – 11 pt. Arial or Calibri
Paragraph – 1.5 line spaced
Margins – 1 inch all sides
Total Length – 8 to 9 pages including Title, Abstract and References
References – 8 to 10 scholarly articles
Peer Review
Please provide feedback with reference to the Evaluation Checklist. Note that in this module, we’ve moved away from using a rubric to a checklist approach. This method of making sure that all critical elements have been included in a resource/publication can also be helpful.
Mod Literature Review Evaluation Rubric.docx (NEED UPDATED LINK)
When you provide your feedback on peer documents, please use the Track Change or Comment feature(s) in Word if you are going to type within the original document. Alternately, you can type comments on the Evaluation Checklist document itself.
Please remember to save your document with these words “Reviewed by (insert your last name)”. File naming conventions help manage version control.
