The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health.
Your presentation should:
1. Identify and select a screening tool
2. Research of ethical, economical and legal issues relative to the practice in relation to health promotion protocol/practice.
3. Provide recommendations.
Submission Instructions:
- Presentation is original work and logically organized in the current APA style including citation of references.
- Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
- PowerPoint presentation with 10-15 slides, excluding the title slide and the reference slide.
- The presentation is clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
- Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
- Edit
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Presentation Rubric | ||
---|---|---|
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
Identification of Main Issues/Problems |
4 pts Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems. 3 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems. 2 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. 1 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. 0 pts No Submission |
/ 4 pts |
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms |
4 pts Distinguished Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 3 pts Excellent Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems. 2 pts Fair Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 1 pts Poor Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. 0 pts No Submission |
/ 4 pts |
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding |
4 pts Distinguished Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding. 3 pts Excellent Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 2 pts Fair Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 1 pts Poor Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. 0 pts No Submission |
/ 4 pts |
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature |
4 pts Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. 3 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 2 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. 1 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. 0 pts No Submission |
/ 4 pts |
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines |
4 pts Distinguished Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. 3 pts Excellent Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 2 pts Fair Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 1 pts Poor Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. 0 pts No Submission |
/ 4 pts |
Total Points: 0 |
Choose a submission type