This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverview and pathophysiology of the medical illness
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Explains clearly and thoroughly the medical condition and how the patient may present to the acute care facility.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Provides partial overview of the medical condition and how the patient may present to the acute care facility.
|
10 to >5.0 pts
Below Expectations
Provides brief and incomplete understanding of the medical condition.
|
5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not provide brief/incomplete understanding of the medical condition.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation and management in the emergency department
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the management of the acutely ill patient in the emergency department. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of the management of the acutely ill patient in the emergency department. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic.
|
10 to >5.0 pts
Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of the management of the acutely ill patient in the emergency department. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic.
|
5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not answer, or incorrectly answers, with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagement in the inpatient unit
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the management of the acutely ill patient in the inpatient unit. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of the management of the acutely ill patient in the inpatient unit. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic.
|
10 to >5.0 pts
Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of the management of the acutely ill patient in the inpatient unit. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic.
|
5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagement in the intensive care unit
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the management of the acutely ill patient in the intensive care. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis of the management of the acutely ill patient in the intensive care unit. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic.
|
10 to >5.0 pts
Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of the management of the acutely ill patient in the intensive care unit. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic.
|
5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDischarge criteria
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of the discharge criteria. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Presents an accurate analysis the discharge criteria. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions regarding chosen topic.
|
10 to >5.0 pts
Below Expectations
Provides insufficient explanations of the discharge criteria. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusions regarding chosen topic.
|
5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations that show no understanding of current trend/issue. Information is not scientifically sound
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Makes insightful, clear, and accurate connections relating to proper documentation and the appropriate use of clinical notes. Offers detailed and specific examples regarding effect on current clinical practice settings.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Makes mostly accurate connections relating to proper documentation and the appropriate use of clinical notes, but may lack an important detail. Response indicates a general understanding regarding effect on current clinical practice settings.
|
10 to >5.0 pts
Below Expectations
Provides several insufficient or inaccurate connections relating to proper documentation and the appropriate use of clinical notes. Response indicates an introductory understanding regarding effect on current clinical practice settings.
|
5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of current trend/issue and importance to lobby for any support funding.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Provides fully applications from clinical/personal to practice.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Provides partially applications from clinical/personal to practice.
|
10 to >5.0 pts
Below Expectations
Provides brief or incomplete applications from clinical/personal to practice.
|
5 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Provides no brief, no applications from clinical/personal to practice.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences, APA Style, grammar, spelling, and punctuation
|
10 to >8.54 pts
Meets or Exceeds Expectations
Complete list of references/citations with no APA errors Include peer research based articles. Speaker notes were included for each slide.
|
8.54 to >7.2 pts
Mostly Meets Expectations
Mostly complete list of references or citations with 1-3 APA errors Include mostly peer research based articles. Speaker notes were included for most of the slides.
|
7.2 to >5.66 pts
Below Expectations
Partial list of references or citations with 3-5 APA errors Include few peer research based articles. Speaker notes were included for less than most slides.
|
5.66 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
No references listed or cited with multiple errors Include no peer research based articles. No speaker notes were included.
|
|
10 pts
|
Total Points: 150
|