TASK: Your task is to correct the problems/errors within this essay. If we were to develop this into an effective argument that meets the goals I have for you for analyzing film in this class, we would first need to identify the problems. Be sure to address each of the following prompts: Your responses to the prompts should both tell and show the corrections. You will have a sentence or two that tells me what corrections are necessary and then you will also have the corrections below that statement. LABEL your responses please.
FORMAT: Be sure to number each prompt above as you add to or correct. Label the prompt above (1) (2) etc as you make corrections. Ensure you address all prompts. Your responses to the prompts should both tell and show the corrections. You might have a sentence or two that tells me what corrections are necessary and then you might also have the corrections below that statement. LABEL your responses please.
TIPS:
* A film scene analysis includes identifying and thoroughly describing a film scene and using at least one film term to describe the important elements of the construction of the film scene. Name and situate the film scene before you begin discussing it. Clearly tell me how your evidence from the film (the film scene you used) supports the thesis/claim made about The Monuments Men and the concept of the nation. Be specific and as clear as possible about the connection you make. Use film terms included in our Methods module.
I Will need a MLA source for the book (ATTACHED IN FILES) and movie
THE ESSAY YOUR CORRECTING: 1. Correct the AI Response that articulates the concept(s): The following is a response by Perplexityai using this prompt ““Pedro Mota says there are two different reasons people use to explain why van Gogh’s was a successful painter within his article, “Creativity and Mental Illness: Vincent van Gogh as the Archetypal Figure.” published in the The Journal of Psychohistory. Define the two reasons/two sides of the debate Mota says exists about why Van Gogh was a successful painter. Cite Pedro Mota’s article.” Ensure that Mota’s concepts are accurately articulated AND that Mota’s work is cited properly according to MLA within the text of the writing..
According to Pedro Mota’s article “Creativity and Mental Illness: Vincent van Gogh as the Archetypal Figure” published in The Journal of Psychohistory, there is a debate about why Van Gogh was a successful painter. Mota identifies two different reasons or sides of the debate. The first could be called the romantic view which suggests that Van Gogh’s mental illness was the source of his creativity and artistic success. According to this view, Van Gogh’s mental illness allowed him to see the world in a unique way and to express his emotions in his art. This view romanticizes mental illness and suggests that it is a necessary condition for artistic creativity. The other side of the debate could be called the pathological view, which suggests that Van Gogh’s mental illness was a hindrance to his artistic success. According to this view, Van Gogh’s mental illness made it difficult for him to function in society and to maintain relationships, which ultimately led to his suicide. This view suggests that Van Gogh’s artistic success was despite his mental illness, not because of it. Mota argues that both views are oversimplified and that the relationship between mental illness and creativity is complex and multifaceted. He suggests that Van Gogh’s artistic success was the result of a combination of factors, including his unique perspective, his dedication to his craft, and his ability to express his emotions through his art (Pedro, Perplexityai)
2. Form a claim that applies the concept: I put several prompts into Perplexityai (I also checked other tools) and the responses were inadequate because they did not take a definitive side of the debate. Review the responses and the prompts. Now you should take over for the Ai tool. Form a claim: Which side of the debate do you think the filmmakers fall on? Cite the article and film as necessary.
3. Provide evidence: How can you know what you know? Name and fully describe one scene from the film that best supports this position. Describe the film scene using film terms. Be specific. Cite the film.
4. Explain your logic: Explain how your conclusions about the film scene support your claim. Be specific and clear.
5. Correct/Include all works cited citations: Works Cited Entries are necessary. Please get in the habit of including them. You need one for the film and one for the article.
Works Cited
“Pedro Mota says there are two different reasons people use to explain why van Gogh’s was a successful painter within his article, “Creativity and Mental Illness: Vincent van Gogh as the Archetypal Figure.” published in the The Journal of Psychohistory. Define the two reasons/two sides of the debate Mota says exists about why Van Gogh was a successful painter. Cite Pedro Mota’s article.” prompt. Perplexityai.com Nov 5, 2023.
“What evidence in the film Loving Vincent supports that the filmmakers believed that Van Gogh’s genius was due to his mental illness?” prompt. Perplexityai.com. perplexity.ai Nov 5, 2023.
“Which side of this debate do the filmmakers of Loving Vincent fall on?” prompt. Perplexityai. perplexity.ai Nov 5, 2023.
