Select 2–3 resources from the SOBTH Doctoral Networking and Support: Resources and then summarize their main points and relevance to the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook.
For this assessment, you will delve into the SOBTH Doctoral Networking and Support: ResourcesLinks to an external site. to select and review 2–3 webinars, videos, or recordings focusing on various aspects of writing a Capstone project, such as Problem Statements, Gaps in Practice, Purpose Statements, Project Questions, Project Techniques, and Theoretical Frameworks. Afterward, you will analyze and align the key concepts from these resources with the sections of the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook, summarizing the main points conveyed by the presenters and highlighting their relevance to the guidebook’s requirements in a 2-page reflection.
Go to the SOBTH Doctoral Networking and Support: Resources. Review 2–3 webinars, videos, or recordings related to writing a Capstone project. You may choose any recordings that involve content such as Problem Statements, Gaps in Practice, Purpose Statements and Project Questions, Project Techniques, Theoretical Frameworks, or other recordings.
Requirements:
Download and save the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook [PDF]. In a 2-page reflection, explain which sections of the Capstone Project are aligned with the webinars, videos, or recordings you reviewed in SOBTH Doctoral Networking and Support: Resources. For each recording you view, what were the main points the presenter conveyed, and how do those concepts align with the requirements in the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook?
In your reflection, be sure to include the following:
List at least two specific webinars, videos, or recordings you chose for review and briefly explain why you selected them. Mention any particular topics or concepts you expected to find.
For each resource you reviewed, summarize the main points or key concepts presented by the speaker or presenter. Be concise and provide enough detail to convey the essence of each resource.
Identify the sections or elements of the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook that align with the concepts discussed in the webinars, videos, or recordings. Specify which sections of the guidebook are relevant to each resource.
Reflect on how the concepts presented in the selected resources align with the requirements or guidelines provided in the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook. Discuss the similarities and connections between the two.
Remember to maintain clarity, brevity, and coherence throughout your reflection, focusing on the most significant points and their alignment with the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook.
As you complete your assessment, be sure it meets the following guidelines:
Written communication: Use error-free, doctoral-level writing with original (non-plagiarized) content, logical phrasing, and accurate word choices.
APA formatting: All resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
Length: Two typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Consistent, APA-compliant font, 12 point.
For this assessment, you are required to follow the Standard Naming Convention requirements for any files you upload. You will find the requirements on the DBA Submissions Requirements page.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Write abbreviated project proposals to conceptualize ideas, which are valid and meaningful to leadership professionals.
List the specific webinars, videos, or recordings selected for review and provide a brief explanation for the selection, including any expected topics or concepts.
For each resource reviewed, provide concise yet comprehensive summaries of the main points or key concepts presented by the speaker or presenter
Clearly specify which sections or elements of the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook align with the concepts discussed in the selected webinars, videos, or recordings.
Accurately reflect on how the concepts from the chosen resources align with the requirements or guidelines in the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook, including the similarities and connections between the concepts, emphasizing their relevance and significance in relation to the guidebook.
Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
