Rewrite the 5 pages I will provide you as they were written with AI; and make sure it follows the following instructions (the ai written essay is further down), the sources must come from the book provided below and if you think the sources used are good then you do not have to change them:
This assignment asks you to choose at least three examples of your work on Paper 1 (we’ll call these examples “artifacts”) and save them in your portfolio. These examples can be anything that relates to your learning, challenges you faced, or something you are proud of. Artifacts can include notes, journal entries, drafts, assignments, evidence of a conference–really anything that’s meaningful that shows your reading and writing process.
Once you have selected your artifacts, write a reflection that explains why you selected these examples. This reflection should be around two pages, double spaced. In your explanations, connect back to your goals for the course, as discussed in your goal memo from a month ago. To what extent did working on this first paper help you make progress on your goals? Did you progress in unexpected ways as a writer, reader, thinker, and student? What did you expect, and what surprised you?
We’re also going to use this reflection to think about ways we’re updating our views as we research and write–both our views on our topic and our views of ourselves. To complete this part of the reflection, read Think Again, the prologue through the end of Chapter 2. You can also watch the TED talk I’ve embedded here! Then, write around 1-2 pages discussing how Grant’s ideas in “Part 1: Individual Rethinking” apply to your work on Paper 1. Integrate at least three quotes into this part of your reflection.
To complete this assignment, add your reflection and at least three artifacts to your writing portfolio. Also, upload your reflection document (around 4 pages) to this link.
Reflection on Selected Artifacts
Initial Draft of the Introduction
The initial draft of the introduction to my paper on the impact of social media on youth mental health is a key artifact in my portfolio. This draft represents the foundation of my research and writing process. When I first approached the topic, I had a strong conviction about the negative effects of social media. My introduction focused on setting the stage for discussing these adverse impacts, particularly on teenagers and young adults.
Reason for Selection: I selected this draft because it highlights the beginning of my journey in understanding and articulating the issue. It shows my initial thoughts and the framework I planned to build upon. This artifact is crucial as it marks the starting point of my exploration and the baseline from which my ideas evolved.
Reflection: Working on this draft was instrumental in helping me organize my thoughts and outline the key points I wanted to address. It forced me to think critically about the scope of my paper and the arguments I needed to make. This process was not without its challenges. Initially, I struggled with narrowing down the vast topic of social media’s impact on mental health into a focused introduction. However, this struggle was beneficial as it pushed me to refine my thesis and clearly define the direction of my paper. Revisiting this draft now, I can see the progress I have made in structuring a cohesive argument and how this initial effort laid the groundwork for my final paper.
Annotated Bibliography
The annotated bibliography is another significant artifact I have included in my portfolio. This document contains detailed notes on the sources I used, including their relevance, credibility, and how they support my arguments.
Reason for Selection: I chose the annotated bibliography because it demonstrates the depth of my research and my engagement with the literature. It shows my ability to critically evaluate sources and integrate them into my paper effectively. This artifact reflects my efforts to build a strong, evidence-based argument.
Reflection: Compiling the annotated bibliography was a crucial step in my research process. It required me to sift through numerous articles, studies, and reports to find the most relevant and credible sources. This task improved my research skills significantly. I learned to discern between high-quality and low-quality sources and to identify biases and gaps in the literature. The annotated bibliography also helped me organize my research and provided a clear roadmap for writing my paper. It was during this process that I began to see the complexity of the issue and realized the importance of presenting a balanced argument. This artifact highlights my growth in research skills and my commitment to thorough, meticulous scholarship.
Peer Review Feedback
The third artifact I have chosen is the feedback I received from my peers during the review process. This feedback included comments on the clarity, coherence, and strength of my arguments, as well as suggestions for improvement.
Reason for Selection: I selected the peer review feedback because it underscores the collaborative nature of the writing process. It provides insights into how my paper was perceived by others and highlights areas that needed refinement.
Reflection: The peer review feedback was invaluable in helping me improve my paper. It offered a fresh perspective on my work and pointed out aspects that I had overlooked or taken for granted. For example, my peers noted that while my arguments were strong, some sections lacked clarity and needed more supporting evidence. This feedback prompted me to revisit those sections, clarify my points, and bolster my arguments with additional research. The peer review process also taught me the importance of constructive criticism and how to use it to enhance my work. It was a reminder that writing is an iterative process that benefits from collaboration and multiple rounds of revision. This artifact reflects my ability to take feedback constructively and use it to produce a more polished and coherent paper.
Connection to Course Goals
Reflecting on these artifacts in relation to my course goals, I can see significant progress in several areas. One of my primary goals was to improve my research skills, and the annotated bibliography is a testament to that progress. The process of evaluating and integrating sources has made me a more discerning and effective researcher.
Another goal was to enhance my ability to construct well-supported arguments. The initial draft of my introduction and the revisions based on peer feedback have helped me achieve this goal. I have learned to articulate my points clearly, support them with evidence, and address counterarguments effectively.
Lastly, I aimed to become more proficient in academic writing. The iterative process of drafting, receiving feedback, and revising has honed my writing skills. I have learned to value clarity and conciseness, which has helped me communicate my ideas more effectively. The artifacts I have selected showcase my growth in these areas and highlight the progress I have made towards my course goals.
Reflection on Adam Grant’s “Think Again: Individual Rethinking” and Its Application to My Work on Paper 1
In “Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don’t Know,” Adam Grant explores the concept of individual rethinking, urging readers to embrace the mindset of questioning their own beliefs and being open to new perspectives. As I reflect on my work on Paper 1, I find that Grant’s ideas on individual rethinking significantly influenced my approach and development as a writer and researcher.
One of the core principles Grant discusses is the importance of “thinking like a scientist.” He encourages us to “develop the habit of forming opinions based on evidence, rather than on the opinions of others or our own initial intuitions” (Grant, 2021). This approach was particularly relevant as I navigated the complex topic of social media’s impact on youth mental health. Initially, my perspective was heavily influenced by popular narratives that predominantly highlight the negative effects of social media. However, as I engaged with a wide range of research during the annotated bibliography phase, I began to challenge my preconceived notions and consider more nuanced views. For instance, I discovered studies that highlighted the potential for social media to create supportive communities and improve mental health for isolated individuals. This shift in perspective was a direct result of adopting a scientific mindset and being open to evidence that contradicted my initial beliefs.
Grant also emphasizes the value of humility in the rethinking process. He asserts that “the mark of lifelong learners is recognizing that they can learn something from everyone they meet” (Grant, 2021). This concept was vividly brought to life during the peer review process. Receiving feedback from my peers, who had diverse viewpoints and insights, was initially challenging. Some comments pointed out flaws and gaps in my arguments that I had not considered. Instead of dismissing this feedback, I embraced it as an opportunity to improve my paper. This humility allowed me to refine my arguments, clarify my points, and ultimately produce a more robust and balanced paper. For example, my peers suggested that I explore both the negative and positive impacts of social media to provide a more comprehensive analysis. This advice led me to broaden my research and include sections on the potential benefits of social media, thus enriching my paper.
Another crucial lesson from Grant is the importance of flexibility and adaptability in our thinking. He notes that “rethinking is a skill set, but it’s also a mindset” (Grant, 2021). This idea resonated with me deeply as I encountered unexpected challenges while working on Paper 1. For instance, while researching the effects of social media, I found that much of the existing literature was either overly critical or excessively optimistic, with few sources providing a balanced view. This forced me to adapt my approach, seeking out interdisciplinary sources and incorporating qualitative studies to present a more nuanced argument. This flexibility not only improved the quality of my paper but also enhanced my ability to navigate complex topics in future projects.
Grant’s concept of “confident humility” also played a pivotal role in my work. He explains that “confident humility is the sweet spot between having too much doubt and too much certainty” (Grant, 2021). This balance was crucial in maintaining my confidence while remaining open to new information and perspectives. As I wrote and revised my paper, I continuously questioned my assumptions and sought feedback, which helped me stay grounded and avoid the pitfalls of overconfidence. For example, while I was confident in my understanding of the negative impacts of social media, I remained humble enough to investigate and include counterarguments and alternative perspectives. This balanced approach ensured that my paper was well-rounded and credible.
In conclusion, the principles of individual rethinking as outlined by Adam Grant in “Think Again” had a profound impact on my approach to Paper 1. By thinking like a scientist, embracing humility, being adaptable, and practicing confident humility, I was able to challenge my initial assumptions, integrate diverse perspectives, and produce a more comprehensive and insightful paper. These lessons have not only enriched my work on this project but have also equipped me with valuable skills for future academic and professional endeavors.
