Read the case study listed below and use this table as your guide to create a post that addresses all the 6 areas (DSM 5-TR-Diagnosis, Rationale, Differential Diagnostic Considerations, Treatment Plan, Research Considerations, and Cultural considerations) listed in the table. Your response may be posted in table format with the title of each section below or may be in paragraph format, section headers are required.
DSM 5 Diagnosis
Provide the correct DSM-5-TR diagnosis in the correct written format; incorrect diagnoses may be awarded partial credit depending on similarity to the correct diagnosis.
Rationale for Diagnosis
The rationale must include reasons why you believe the diagnostic criteria have been met. Copying and pasting the DSM-5-TR criteria or listing word for word what can be found in the case study will not suffice. Include your conceptualization of the client.
Differential Diagnostic Considerations
Include a brief discussion of at least 2 other disorders that were considered, ruled out, and why (differential diagnosis).
Treatment Plan
Treatment plan must include a problem statement, two goals, each goal must include at least one objective and two appropriate, corresponding interventions.
Research Considerations
Briefly discuss at least two relevant research findings with regards to the latest information on the diagnosis and/or treatment of this disorder. You reference least one peer-reviewed article.
Cultural Considerations
Briefly discuss at least two cultural considerations relevant to the case including potential areas for bias, misinterpretation, and/or cultural impacts on the client’s experience of diagnosis and/or treatment.
Case # 4 Jonathan
Jonathan Wagner, a 25-year-old Native American, single graduate student, complains to his psychoanalyst of difficulty completing his doctorate in English literature and expresses concerns about his relationships with women. He believes that his thesis topic may profoundly increase the level of understanding in his discipline and make him famous, but so far he has not been able to get past the third chapter. His mentor does not seem sufficiently impressed with his ideas, and Mr. Wagner is furious at him, but he is also self-doubting and ashamed. He blames his mentor for his lack of progress and thinks that he deserves more help with his grand idea and that his mentor should help with some of the research. The patient brags about his creativity and complains that other people are “jealous” of his insight. He is very envious of students who are moving along faster than he, whom he regards as “dull drones and teachers pets.” He prides himself on the brilliance of his classroom participation and imagines someday becoming a great professor.
Mr. Wagner becomes rapidly infatuated with women and has powerful and persistent fantasies about each new woman he meets, but after several experiences of sexual intercourse he feels disappointed in them and finds them dumb, clinging, and physically repugnant. He has many “friends,” but they turn over quickly, and no one relationship lasts very long. People get tired of his continual self-promotion and lack of consideration of them. For example, he was going to be alone this past Christmas and tried to insist that his best friend stay in town rather than visit his family. The friend refused, criticizing the patient’s self-centeredness; the patient, enraged, decided never to see this friend again.
