Please see Feedback attached documents
Case Study Research Rubric
Criteria Ratings
Writing Mechanics
MASTERY
Only minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present (1-2 errors). The overall sentence structure is well developed throughout, and paragraphs are fully developed with consistent style and clear communication.
PROFICIENT
Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (3-4 errors)
DEVELOPING
Minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are not consistently developed. (5-7 errors)
EMERGING
Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 7-9 errors)
NOT EVIDENT
Significant spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are poorly developed. (10 or more errors)
Comments
There were no spelling or grammatical errors in this assignment.
Sources
MASTERY
The use of sources was consistent throughout the document in all areas to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.
PROFICIENT
In most areas, sources were consistently used throughout the submission to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.
DEVELOPING
Sources were occasionally used to support some claims and/or statements in the artifact, but statements were not consistently supported with sources throughout.
EMERGING
Minimal usage of sources present in the artifact, and/or the overall communication lacked appropriate research support.
NOT EVIDENT
Sources were not used to support major statements and/or claims, where needed in the artifact.
Comments
Minimal sources were used but not the number that was required for this assignment. Please see the instructions and add more content, citation, and references. You only have seven sources and the assignment’s instructions state to have 10.
APA formatting
MASTERY
Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with only one or two minor errors.
PROFICIENT
Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with more than 2 errors, but they are minor.
DEVELOPING
APA style is demonstrated with some consistency, but the majority of the citation, references, and/or formatting is not correct.
EMERGING
Formatting, citations, and/or references, are attempted, but do not follow APA style guidelines consistently.
NOT EVIDENT
Formatting, citations, and references are not included, or do not follow appropriate APA style guide.
Comments
Citations and references were consistent with APA formatting.
The elements of the case study research include: Introduction, literature review, theoretical and conceptual framework. The case study methodology was explained; the analysis and conclusion were included.
MASTERY
All elements were present and the analysis and conclusion show mastery of the topic of leadership theories and concepts.
PROFICIENT
All nine elements of the case study were present but not as clearly written for the context of leadership theories and concepts.
DEVELOPING
Six elements of the case study were present and were only adequately complete in context of leadership theories and concepts.
EMERGING
Four or less elements of the case study research were present and were not complete.
NOT EVIDENT
Did not submit or there was no evidence that the student understood the assignment.
Comments
Be sure to add more content to ensure you include all the elements listed below. I encourage you to use section headers as they will guide you as you are writing and will guide the reader.
In this assessment, you will develop a case study research report based upon the examples you have reviewed and mirroring the methodology of one you select as a model. The case study will assess the leadership challenges of the organization you have selected and determine the best strategy to overcome the challenges while maintaining or improving market position and competitiveness based upon the information that is accessible to you.
A case study research report includes a review of the literature, theoretical and/or conceptual framework, and an outcome or conclusion based on the evaluation included within the report. Throughout this program you have been reading articles on case studies about leadership. Now it is your turn to combine what you have learned with your assessment of leadership styles, leadership issues, and strategies by providing a review of the literature and an in-depth evaluation of the styles, issues, and challenges of global leaders. As you choose the organization to evaluate, please keep in mind you need to have the necessary data to communicate the challenges and market position/competitiveness. Keep in mind that you will use the methodology of one of the case studies you reviewed during the literature review.
Within the deliverable itself you will practice a level of research, analysis, and evaluation similar to portions of your dissertation; however, this will not be that length or depth yet. In your case study, you will assess the leadership challenges of the organization(s) of your choice. Through your research you will analyze the executive leadership strategies demonstrated within the organization(s) and document the best strategies used by these organization(s) to overcome challenges while maintaining or improving market position and competitiveness. Your conclusions should be informed significantly by the literature review you have already completed on the theories and practices of effective executive leadership and the professional literature on the practices used in your organizational research completed in this competency.
Leadership strategy and challenges were identified and conclusions were consistent with the practices and theories of global leadership and strategies for growth.
MASTERY
Outstanding identification of leadership challenges and conclusions were based on global leadership theory, which was supported by the research.
PROFICIENT
Leadership challenges were identified, conclusions were adequate, and both were based on theories and practices of global leadership strategies for growth.
DEVELOPING
Leadership challenges were adequately identified but the conclusions were not based on theories and practices of global leadership strategies for growth.
EMERGING
Few leadership challenges were identified and the conclusions were not based on theories and practices of global leadership strategies for growth.
NOT EVIDENT
Did not submit or there was no evidence that the student understood the assignment.
Comments
You touched on some strategies and challenges. As you go back and add more content, your score will move to the Mastery level. Be sure to add more than two sentences in your conclusion. At the doctoral level, a paragraph should consist of at least three sentences. You mentioned a strategy of assuming leadership. Additional additional strategies can help you move to the Mastery level. You mentioned a challenge of creating reusable rockets and spacecrafts and competing with old and established aerospace corporations and newcomers. This is great. I want to see more strategies.
