Please see attached for the essay questions and instructions. See below for the rubric.
Thank you
Analysis Paper Rubrics
Analysis Paper Rubrics
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1. How do you think these two issues can get to the decision-making table? (Agenda-Setting)
15 to >10.0 pts
Full Marks
A good answer will include at least 4 possible ways by which the issues will get to the decision-making table of the Mayor.
10 to >5.0 pts
Good
This means you provided a maximum of 3 possible ways that the issue will get to the decision-making stage or the Mayor.
5 to >0.0 pts
Below Average
You provided less than 3 options or ways.
0 pts
No Marks
No answer or a deviation from the question.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2.What policy option will you go for as the Mayor?
5 pts
Full Marks
You do not need to explain at this stage. Straight forward answer is expected.
0 pts
No Marks
No answer or a deviation from the question.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. Why did you choose the option above?
20 to >12.0 pts
Full Marks
A good answer will incorporate the theories we have learned so far.
12 to >4.0 pts
Good
This means you provided or explained your points based on a couple of theories or concepts. Probably just 2 concepts.
4 to >0.0 pts
Not Good
You did not include any concept in your definitions or explanations.
0 pts
No Marks
No answer or a deviation from the question.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome4. Who are the likely institutional actors that will be involved in this issue?
10 to >8.0 pts
Full Marks
At least 2 actors have been listed and their roles have been discussed briefly.
8 to >5.0 pts
Good
At least 1 actor has been listed and their roles have been discussed briefly.
5 to >2.0 pts
Below Average
You provided at least two actors but no discussion on their roles.
2 to >0 pts
No Marks
No answer or a deviation from the question.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome5. Who are the likely non-institutional actors that may be involved in this issue?
10 to >8.0 pts
Full Marks
At least 2 actors have been listed and their roles have been discussed briefly.
8 to >5.0 pts
Good
At least 1 actor has been listed and their roles have been discussed briefly.
5 to >2.0 pts
Below Average
You provided at least two actors but no discussion on their roles.
2 to >0 pts
No Marks
No answer or a deviation from the question.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome6. Assuming you are a Republican/Democrat, what factors would you consider in deciding on this matter? Choose one ideology
20 to >12.0 pts
Full Marks
A good answer will incorporate the theories we have learned so far. Your understanding of the principles or ideologies of your chosen party must also show in your answer.
12 to >4.0 pts
Good
This means you provided or explained your points based on a couple of theories or concepts. Probably just 2 concepts. Your understanding of the principles or ideologies of your chosen party is not very concise.
4 to >0.0 pts
Not Good
You did not include any concept in your definitions or explanations. You do not probably understand the principles or ideologies of your chosen party.
0 pts
No Marks
No answer or a deviation from the question.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome7.What elements of policy-making will you consider?
10 to >7.0 pts
Full Marks
All possible elements have been discussed or stated.
7 to >1.0 pts
Average
Some elements have been discussed.
1 to >0 pts
No Marks
No answer or a deviation from the question.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome8. Do you think the City council will approve your policy choice?
10 to >7.0 pts
Full Marks
You have shown that it is politically feasible.
7 to >3.0 pts
Good
You have been able to defend your view even though it might not be politically feasible.
3 to >0 pts
No Marks
No answer or a deviation from the question.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
