PLEASE READ QUESTIONS THOROUGHLY AND ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS BELOW
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
General Instructions
Complete the TIGER-based Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies (TANIC) self-assessment toolLinks to an external site..
Take a screenshot of the last page of the completed TANIC self-assessment survey using a Snipping Tool or other tools. Save the image as a PDF or JPG. If you are unable to take a screenshot, please notify course faculty.
ATTENTION: Students will not receive results following completion of this survey. For the reflection questions, please recall how you rated your proficiency/competency with the skills on the survey.
Permission is granted by Chamberlain University for non-commercial use of the TIGER-based-Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies (TANIC) in the context of research or practice, provided credit is given as noted below.
Hunter, K. M., McGonigle, D. M., & Hebda, T. L. (2013). TIGER-based measurement of nursing informatics competencies: The development and implementation of an online tool for self-assessment. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(12), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v3n12p70
Include the following sections:
Address the discussion questions below by using your self-appraisal proficiency/competency skill ratings identified on the TANIC survey.
Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
Discuss how your perceived proficiency level in informatics compared to your TANIC Self-Assessment responses.
Describe two competencies identified as strengths.
Describe two competencies identified as growth opportunities.
Describe at least two strategies to enhance your competencies.
Identify resources to support your selected strategies.
Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations:
Cite 4 scholarly source in the initial post.
Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post and one peer post.
Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
Include a minimum of three different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.
Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers and faculty by asking questions, and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice
