Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
- This assignment will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading rubric.
- Create your essay using Microsoft Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain documents.
- The length of the paper is to be no less than 4 full pages from top to bottom and no greater than 5 full pages from top to bottom, excluding title and reference pages.
- APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface).
- Note: Introduction—write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.
- Review the readings, lesson notes, and digital media about healthcare policy and use the rubric to develop your paper
- QUESTION:
- This policy analysis paper will address the problems which lies within policies that impact the access to HIV/AIDS screenings and preventative treatments.
Healthcare Policy Analysis Paper Grading Rubric
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem StatementDefine the problem to be analyzed. Include a brief description of the problem along with a well-stated problem statement. The problem statement should address its effect on the health of populations. The statement can be a neutral statement or a value-driven statement that provides information on the direction that the policy analysis may take.
|
| 45 pts
Meets All Criteria
Defines the problem to be analyzed well and includes a brief description of the problem along with a well-stated problem statement. The problem statement addresses its effect on the health of populations. The statement is either a neutral statement or a value-driven statement that provides information on the direction that the policy analysis may take.
|
39 pts
Meets Most Criteria
Defines the problem to be analyzed and includes a brief description of the problem along with a well-stated problem statement. The problem statement addresses its effect on the health of populations. It does not provide information on the direction that the policy analysis may take.
|
34 pts
Partially Meets Criteria
Problem is not clearly defined nor analyzed. The problem statement does not clearly address its effect on the health of populations or the direction that the policy analysis may take.
|
0 pts
Does Not Meet Criteria
Problem is not clearly defined nor analyzed. No problem statement included.
|
|
45 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBackgroundIn this section, the problem is defined in more detail that outlines any adverse effect on the health of populations. Vital statistics can be used to provide evidence that the problem indeed has an effect on the health of populations. In this section, you want the seriousness of the problem to be evident to the reader. Scientific data from studies, pertinent laws, and cost impact and financing can be included to indicate the depth of the problem. If there are any ethical considerations, these can be included in this section. Provide enough factual information that highlights the seriousness of the problem.
|
| 48 pts
Meets All Criteria
Problem is clearly defined in detail and outlines adverse effects on the health of populations. Vital statistics are used to provide evidence that the problem indeed has an effect on the health of populations. Seriousness of the problem is evident to the reader. The depth of the problem is evident by scientific data from studies, pertinent laws, cost impact, and financing. If present, ethical considerations are included. Provides enough factual information that highlights the seriousness of the problem.
|
41 pts
Meets Most Criteria
Problem is clearly defined in detail and outlines adverse effects on the health of populations. Vital statistics are used to provide evidence that the problem indeed has an effect on the health of populations. Seriousness of the problem is evident to the reader. The depth of the problem is not adequately supported by scientific data from studies, pertinent laws, cost impact, and financing.
|
36 pts
Partially Meets Criteria
Problem is not clearly defined in enough detail to outline adverse effects on the health of populations. Minimal vital statistics are used to provide evidence that the problem indeed has an effect on the health of populations. Minimal scientific data from studies, pertinent laws, cost impact, and financing are used.
|
0 pts
Does Not Meet Criteria
Problem is not clearly defined in enough detail to outline adverse effects on the health of populations. No vital statistics are used to provide evidence that the problem indeed has an effect on the health of populations. Minimal scientific data from studies, pertinent laws, cost impact, and financing are used.
|
|
48 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLandscapeDiscuss the key stakeholders and their positions as they relate to political, social, and economic factors. The purpose of the Landscape section is to provide the reader with information about the key stakeholders and their positions on the problem.
|
| 50 pts
Meets All Criteria
Key stakeholders and their positions as they relate to political, social, and economic factors are thoroughly discussed so that the reader has an adequate amount of information about the key stakeholders and their positions on the problem.
|
43 pts
Meets Most Criteria
Key stakeholders are identified, however, their positions as they relate to political, social, and economic factors are not thoroughly discussed so that the reader does not have an adequate amount of information about the key stakeholders and their positions on the problem.
|
38 pts
Partially Meets Criteria
Key stakeholders are not clearly identified nor are their positions as they relate to political, social, and economic factors. Some amount of information about the key stakeholders and their positions on the problem is evident.
|
0 pts
Does Not Meet Criteria
Key stakeholders are not clearly identified nor are their positions as they relate to political, social, and economic factors. An adequate amount of information about the key stakeholders and their positions on the problem is missing.
|
|
50 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOptionsDescribe and analyze two laws, bills, acts, regulations or mandates that address the public health issue. The policies must address the best course of action in alleviating the public health issue you identified. Consider the outcomes of the policies as to how well they address the public health issue (1). This includes presenting the pros and cons of each policy (2). The pros and cons for each policy can be analyzed by cost, political feasibility, legality, fairness, timeliness, or targeted impact (3). How the policies will be evaluated needs to be considered with each policy (4).
|
| 50 pts
Meets All Criteria
Describe and analyze two laws, bills, acts, regulations or mandates that address the public health issue. The description of the policies includes the best course of action in alleviating the public health issue identified. The outcomes of the policies as to how well they address the public health issue is included along with presenting the pros and cons of each policy. The pros and cons for each policy are analyzed by cost, political feasibility, legality, fairness, timeliness, or targeted impact.
|
43 pts
Meets Most Criteria
Describe and analyze two laws, bills, acts, regulations or mandates in 3 of the areas for analysis. The 4th area is general.
|
38 pts
Partially Meets Criteria
Description and analysis is general for each law, bill, act, regulation, or mandate in 2 to 3 of the areas of analysis or is missing 1 area of analysis.
|
0 pts
Does Not Meet Criteria
Description and analysis of each law, bill, act, regulation, or mandate is general or vague in all areas of analysis and is missing 2 or more of the areas of analysis
|
|
50 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendationsOffer one option from the two presented that best addresses the problem. If you think neither option best addresses the problem, you can make a recommendation supported by scholarly literature. Discuss the outcomes of the selected option carefully and provide reasons as to why this is the best option to pursue.
|
| 50 pts
Meets All Criteria
Offers one clear option from the two presented that best addresses the problem. If you think neither option best addresses the problem, a recommendation supported by scholarly literature is provided. Discusses the outcomes of the selected option carefully and provides reasons as to why this is the best option to pursue.
|
43 pts
Meets Most Criteria
Offers one clear option that best addresses the problem. Does not discuss the outcomes of the selected option. Provides reasons as to why this is the best option to pursue.
|
38 pts
Partially Meets Criteria
Offers one clear option that best addresses the problem. Does not discuss the outcomes of the selected option adequately and does not provide adequate reasons as to why this is the best option to pursue.
|
0 pts
Does Not Meet Criteria
The option is not clearly discussed and does not link well with the problem. Does not discuss the outcomes of the selected option and does not provide adequate reasons as to why this is the best option to pursue.
|
|
50 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA FormatAll information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA format:
1. Document setup
2. Title and reference pages
3. Citations in the text and references.
|
| 14 pts
Meets All Criteria
APA properly formatted with no more than one error.
|
12 pts
Meets Most Criteria
Some APA errors in formatting with two to three errors.
|
11 pts
Partially Meets Criteria
APA formatting contains four or more errors.
|
0 pts
Does Not Meet Criteria
APA formatting is not present, or there are five or more errors in formatting.
|
|
14 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of WritingUse of standard English grammar and sentence structure demonstrating primary referencing and original thought. No spelling errors or typographical errors. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers.
|
| 28 pts
Meets All Criteria
Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammatical errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning.
|
24 pts
Meets Most Criteria
Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammatical errors. Generally organized thoughts and concepts.
|
21 pts
Partially Meets Criteria
Language needs development or lack of original thought evident. Four or five spelling and/or grammatical errors.
|
0 pts
Does Not Meet Criteria
Language lacks development and a lack of original thought is evident. Multiple spelling and/or grammatical errors.
|
|
28 pts
|
|
Total Points: 285
|
Requirements: 4-5 Full Pages From Top to Bottom Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph.
Please be sure to use credible or scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
