Please do not use AI or ChatGPT to write my Assignment as the University as introduced a new system which detect the similarity percentages on Turnitin to catch those students who are using these artificially intelligent to do their assignments. This is a very serious issues and it will lead to misconduct and been remove from the programme. So, if you know that you will use any of them, please don’t write my Assignment as I need it from scratch with zero similarity from AI and Turnitin report.
PLEASE READ THIS FEEBACK BELLOW IN ORDER TO IMPROVE AND PASS THIS ASSIGMMENT
Thanks for the submission. You were very close to passing. Please see the feedback below to improve your score. What Went Well: 1. You have chosen an appropriate study for critiquing and mentioned the JBI checklist for cohort studies. 2. You have effectively highlighted the factors contributing to the spread of COVID-19 in nursing homes, providing valuable insights for nursing practices. Areas for Improvement: 1. The provided writing does not explicitly address the JBI checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. To align the feedback with the JBI checklist, it would be beneficial to evaluate the study based on each item in the checklist. For example, instead of making general statements like “deeper insights into the methodological strengths and limitations of the study,” the feedback could address specific checklist items such as sample similarity, measurement validity, handling of confounding factors, follow-up completeness, and appropriate statistical analysis. 2. Structure the essay according to the JBI checklist to provide a more focused and comprehensive evaluation of the study’s methodological quality. 3. Some points could be further clarified to ensure that the reader fully understands the rationale behind each assessment and also not coherent. Clear and explicit explanations can help strengthen the persuasiveness of the critique. For instance, when discussing the methodological limitations of the study’s sampling technique, the critique could provide clearer explanations regarding how the sample was selected and whether it adequately represents the target population. 4. You haven’t critically analyse the recruitment of participants, including similarity, confounding factors, and participants’ status at the start in different nursing homes, while incorporating appropriate statistical analysis. 5. Incorporate alternative viewpoints or interpretations of the research findings to demonstrate critical engagement with the literature and enrich the depth of analysis. 6. There are several citation and referencing errors throughout the essay that need to be corrected for accuracy. Ensuring proper citation formatting and accuracy is essential for academic writing. 7. Most of the statements in the essay are descriptive rather than critically analysing the research findings. Encouraging deeper critical analysis by discussing implications and limitations would strengthen the essay. Suggestions for Improvement: 1. Identify key critique points and expand on them by providing additional context, explanations, or evidence where necessary. This will enrich the analysis and provide greater depth. 2. It could improve by more explicitly linking the identified methodological limitations with their potential impact on nursing practices. For example, how do selection biases or data protocol inadequacies affect the reliability of the study’s conclusions and, consequently, the recommendations for nursing care? 3. Ensure that each critique point is accompanied by a clear justification, supported by evidence from the study or relevant literature. This will strengthen the credibility of the analysis and enhance its persuasiveness. 4. Consider exploring alternative perspectives or interpretations of the research findings to provide a more comprehensive analysis. Discussing potential limitations or biases in the study can further enrich the critical evaluation. 5. Before finalizing the analysis, please follow the provided guideline and seek feedback from instructors, to identify any areas for improvement and refine the critical analysis accordingly.
Vidhya Kaleeswaran , 8 Mar at 21:58
I agree with the marks awarded and comments provided. Dr Masoud Mohammadnezhad (Internal moderator)
Masoud Mohammadnezhad , 17 Mar at 11:41
Please see attached files
Becky Kanku , 14 Apr at 21:15
Marks changed to 35 after rubric check, further assessment and internal moderation.
Angus Sturrock , 2 May at 11:31
