

2173 Salk Avenue, Suite 250 Carlsbad, CA

οƒ 

support@assignmentprep.info

please critique this article https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/ar

July 9, 2024

please critique this article
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.803506/full
follow this rubric
Title
Is the title a good one, succinctly suggesting key variables and the study population?
Abstract
Does the abstract clearly and concisely summarize the main features of the report (problem, methods, results, conclusions)?
Introduction
Statement of the problem
Is the problem stated unambiguously, and is it easy to identify?
Does the problem statement build a cogent, persuasive argument for the new study?
πŸž† Does the problem have significance for nursing? πŸž† Is there a good match between the research problem and the paradigm and methods used? Is a quantitative approach appropriate?
Box 4.3, page 90
2
Hypotheses or research questions
πŸž† Are research questions and/or hypotheses explicitly stated? If not, is their absence justified?
πŸž† Are questions and hypotheses appropriately worded, with clear specification of key variables and the study population? πŸž† Are the questions/hypotheses consistent with the literature review and the conceptual framework?
Box 4.3, page 90
2
Literature review
πŸž† Is the literature review up to date and based mainly on primary sources?
πŸž† Does the review provide a state-of-the-art synthesis of evidence on the problem?
πŸž† Does the literature review provide a sound basis for the new study?
Box 5.4, page 122
4
NURSING RESEARCH_Revised_Summer 2024 11
Conceptual/theoretical framework
Are key concepts adequately defined conceptually?
Is there a conceptual/theoretical framework, rationale, and/or map, and (if so) is it appropriate?
If not, is the absence of one justified?
Box 6.3, page 145

Method
Protection of human rights
➒Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants? Was the study externally reviewed by an IRB/ethics review board?
➒Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to participants?
Box 7.3, page 170
2
Research design
πŸž† Was the most rigorous possible design used, given the study purpose?
πŸž† Were appropriate comparisons made to enhance interpretability of the findings?
πŸž† Was the number of data collection points appropriate? πŸž† Did the design minimize biases and threats to the internal, construct, and external validity of the study (e.g., was blinding used, was attrition minimized)?
Box 9.1, page 230; Box
10.1, page
254
Population and sample
πŸž† Is the population described? Is the sample described in sufficient detail?
πŸž† Was the best possible sampling design used to enhance the sample’s representativeness? Were sampling biases minimized?
πŸž† Was the sample size adequate? Was a power analysis used to estimate sample size needs?
Box 12.1,
page 289
2
Data collection and
measurement
πŸž† Are the operational and conceptual definitions congruent? πŸž† Were key variables operationalized using the best possible method (e.g., interviews, observations, and so on) and with adequate justification?
πŸž† Are specific instruments adequately described and were they good choices, given the study purpose, variables being studied, and the study population?
πŸž† Does the report provide evidence that the data collection methods yielded data that were reliable and valid?
Box 13.1,
page 309;
Box 14.1,
page 347
2
Procedures
πŸž† If there was an intervention, is it adequately described, and was it rigorously developed and implemented? Did most participants allocated to the intervention group actually receive it? Is there evidence of intervention fidelity? πŸž† Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the staff who collected data appropriately trained?
Box 9.1, page 230; Box
10.1, page
254
2
Results
Data analysis
πŸž† Were analyses undertaken to address each research question or test each hypothesis?
πŸž† Were appropriate statistical methods used, given the level of measurement of the variables, number of groups being compared, and assumptions of the tests?
πŸž† Was the most powerful analytic method used (e.g., did the analysis help to control for confounding variables)? πŸž† Were Type I and Type II errors avoided or minimized? πŸž† In intervention studies, was an intention-to-treat analysis performed?
πŸž† Were problems of missing values evaluated and adequately addressed?
Box 16.1,
page 400;
Box 17.1,
page 429
2
Findings
πŸž†Is information about statistical significance presented? Is information about effect size and precision of estimates (confidence intervals) presented?
πŸž† Are the findings adequately summarized, with good use of tables and figures?
πŸž†Are findings reported in a manner that facilitates a metaanalysis, and with sufficient information needed for EBP?
Box 17.1,
page 429;
Box 28.1,
page 687
4
Discussion
Interpretation of the findings
πŸž† Are all major findings interpreted and discussed within the context of prior research and/or the study’s conceptual framework?
πŸž†Are causal inferences, if any, justified?
πŸž† Are interpretations well-founded and consistent with the study’s limitations?
πŸž† Does the report address the issue of the generalizability of the findings?
Box 19.1, page 482
4
Implications/
recommendations
πŸž† Do the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or further researchβ€”and are those implications reasonable and complete?
Box 19.1, page 482
2
Global Issues Presentation
πŸž† Is the report well-written, organized, and sufficiently detailed for critical analysis?
πŸž†In intervention studies, is a CONSORT flow chart provided to show the flow of participants in the study?
πŸž† Is the report written in a manner that makes the findings accessible to practicing nurses?
Box 28.2, page 698
2
Researcher credibility
πŸž† Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?
2
Summary assessment
πŸž† Despite any limitations, do the study findings appear to be validβ€”do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?
πŸž† Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline?
4
Overall critique format
2
Spelling/Grammar
2

Struggling With a Similar Paper? Get Reliable Help Now.

Delivered on time. Plagiarism-free. Good Grades.

What is this?

It’s a homework service designed by a team of 23 writers based in Carlsbad, CA with one specific goal – to help students just like you complete their assignments on time and get good grades!

Why do you do it?

Because getting a degree is hard these days! With many students being forced to juggle between demanding careers, family life and a rigorous academic schedule. Having a helping hand from time to time goes a long way in making sure you get to the finish line with your sanity intact!

How does it work?

You have an assignment you need help with. Instead of struggling on this alone, you give us your assignment instructions, we select a team of 2 writers to work on your paper, after it’s done we send it to you via email.

What kind of writer will work on my paper?

Our support team will assign your paper to a team of 2 writers with a background in your degree – For example, if you have a nursing paper we will select a team with a nursing background. The main writer will handle the research and writing part while the second writer will proof the paper for grammar, formatting & referencing mistakes if any.

Our team is comprised of native English speakers working exclusively from the United States.Β 

Will the paper be original?

Yes! It will be just as if you wrote the paper yourself! Completely original, written from your scratch following your specific instructions.

Is it free?

No, it’s a paid service. You pay for someone to work on your assignment for you.

Is it legit? Can I trust you?

Completely legit, backed by an iron-clad money back guarantee. We’ve been doing this since 2007 – helping students like you get through college.

Will you deliver it on time?

Absolutely! We understand you have a really tight deadline and you need this delivered a few hours before your deadline so you can look at it before turning it in.

Can you get me a good grade? It’s my final project and I need a good grade.

Yes! We only pick projects where we are sure we’ll deliver good grades.

What do you need to get started on my paper?

* The full assignment instructions as they appear on your school account.

* If a Grading Rubric is present, make sure to attach it.

* Include any special announcements or emails you might have gotten from your Professor pertaining to this assignment.

* Any templates or additional files required to complete the assignment.

How do I place an order?

You can do so through our custom order page here or you can talk to our live chat team and they’ll guide you on how to do this.

How will I receive my paper?

We will send it to your email. Please make sure to provide us with your best email – we’ll be using this to communicate to you throughout the whole process.

Getting Your Paper Today is as Simple as ABC

No more missed deadlines! No more late points deductions!

}

You give us your assignments instructions via email or through our order page.

ξ€±

Our support team selects a qualified writing team of 2 writers for you.

l

In under 5 minutes after you place your order, research & writing begins.



Complete paper is delivered to your email before your deadline is up.

Want A Good Grade?

Get a professional writer who has worked on a similar assignment to do this paper for you