This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeI. Patient Information A. Chief complaint on admission B. Admitting diagnosis and /or current diagnosis.
|
10 pts
Excellent
Thorough assessment of data. Explained in detail including an accurate and in-depth understanding of chief complaints and presenting signs/symptoms of the disease process.
|
7.5 pts
Good
Data underdeveloped. Less accuracy in detail and understanding of chief complaints and presenting signs/symptoms
|
5 pts
Average
Missing data. Minimal detail and limited understanding of chief complaints and presenting signs/ symptoms.
|
2.5 pts
Poor
50% of data missing. Absence of detail and understanding of chief complaints and presenting signs/symptoms of the disease process.
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeII. History of present illness, Predisposing Factors, Precipitating event, Perception of Stress,
|
10 pts
Excellent
Thorough assessment of data on History of present illness, Predisposing Factors, Precipitating event, Perception of Stress,
|
7.5 pts
Good
Data underdeveloped. Less accuracy in detail and understanding of History of present illness, Predisposing Factors, Precipitating event, Perception of Stress,
|
5 pts
Average
Missing data. Minimal detail and limited understanding of History of present illness, Predisposing Factors, Precipitating event, Perception of Stress,
|
2.5 pts
Poor
50% of data missing. Absence of detail and understanding of History of present illness, Predisposing Factors, Precipitating event, Perception of Stress,
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIII. Psychosocial Assessment
|
10 pts
Excellent
Thorough psychosocial assessment performed. Data provided is complete.
|
7.5 pts
Good
Less accurate psychosocial assessment performed. Data provided is underdeveloped.
|
5 pts
Average
Less accurate psychosocial assessment performed. Data provided is underdeveloped
|
2.5 pts
Poor
50% of data missing. Absence of detail.
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbnormal lab and hemodynamic values are explained
|
10 pts
Excellent
Identified ordered /prescribed laboratory and diagnostic tests. Provide detail explanation of abnormal results.
|
7.5 pts
Good
Listed the majority of ordered and or prescribed laboratory and diagnostic tests, abnormalities explained
|
5 pts
Average
Stated few ordered/ prescribed laboratory and diagnostic tests. Provides partial explanation of abnormal results.
|
2.5 pts
Poor
Ordered /prescribed laboratory and diagnostic tests are not explained. Failed to explain about abnormal results
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeV. Mental Status Assessment
|
10 pts
Excellent
Thorough mental status assessment performed. Data provided is complete.
|
7.5 pts
Good
Less accurate psychosocial assessment performed. Data provided is underdeveloped.
|
5 pts
Average
Less accurate mental status assessment performed. Data provided is underdeveloped
|
2.5 pts
Poor
50% of data missing. Absence of detail.
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVI. Physical Assessment
|
10 pts
Excellent
Listed all body systems and identified the abnormalities that are relevant to patient’s diagnosis and nursing problem/diagnosis
|
7.5 pts
Good
Listed most of the body systems and identified most abnormalities relevant to patient’s diagnosis and nursing problem/diagnosis
|
5 pts
Average
Listed 50% body systems and identified most abnormalities relevant to patient’s diagnosis and nursing problem/diagnosis
|
2.5 pts
Poor
Listed few body systems and identified most abnormalities relevant to patient’s diagnosis and nursing problem/diagnosis
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVII. Medication Assessment
|
10 pts
Excellent
Listed all current medications citing rationale and relevance to patient’s diagnosis and nursing problem/diagnosis
|
7.5 pts
Good
Listed most of the medications on MAR and relevance to patient’s diagnosis and nursing problem/diagnosis
|
5 pts
Average
Listed 50% of the medications on MAR and relevance to patient’s diagnosis and nursing problems/diagnosis
|
2.5 pts
Poor
Listed no medication related to patient’s medical condition
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVIII.Clinical Judgment
|
10 pts
Excellent
student provides a comprehensive list of prioritized recommendations for health promotion substantiated with referenced rationales. (more than 3 problems
|
7.5 pts
Good
Student provides at least 3 prioritized recommendations for health promotion with rationales provided.
|
5 pts
Average
Student provides 0-1 recommendations with no rationales provided
|
2.5 pts
Poor
student did not submit data
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIX. References
|
10 pts
Excellent
3 sources from multiple peer-review articles/journals in last 5 years
|
7.5 pts
Good
2 sources from multiple peer-review articles/journals in last 5 years
|
5 pts
Average
1 source from peer review articles/journals in 10 years
|
2.5 pts
Poor
ailed to provide reference from single peer review article/journal
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeX. Overall quality of the submission Coherent, Grammar, punctuation.
|
10 pts
Excellent
No errors
|
7.5 pts
Good
Few errors (<than 3)
|
5 pts
Average
Some errors (<than 5)
|
2.5 pts
Poor
Many errors
|
|
10 pts
|
Total Points: 100
|