Part 1:
Draw a flow chart of how you would tackle asking a couple of questions, getting the answers, and creating a dialogue with a prospective student. Write in Pseudo-Code in English to emulate this dialogue. Below is an example, but your flowchart and pseudo-code should be with a prospective student(possibly related to the program and academics); if you prefer, you can craft any other dialog, as long there are at least two branches of choices as illustrated below; of course, you CAN NOT use the example below.
What day is today?
If the answer is a day of the week:
Are you going to work today?
If yes, how do you get to work?
If the answer is a weekend day:
What are you going to do for fun?
If you want to write more detailed pseudocode, take a look here: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/how-to-write-a-pseudo-code/Links to an external site. or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PseudocodeLinks to an external site.
Part 2:
Using Jupyter, create one variable by asking the user ( for example, your colleague) why she/he enrolled in this program and a second one by asking what they want to learn from this course; print both. You can come up with any two questions you want with any audience you prefer, as long as they shape a dialogue sequence.
Submission Instructions
Assignment solution should have a structure: Title page (your name, course name, term, my name), Introduction, Body/Analysis, Conclusions, and References. The actual solution code would go into the Body/Analysis section.
Figure captions should follow the APA format.
Your submission is a Jupyter Notebook (,ipynb) with a (.PDF or .HTML) file. These would include all the text, code, results, plots, images, etc.
Submit the following files:
o ALY2100_FirstnameLastname_WeekX_Term_Year.ipynb
o ALY2100_FirstnameLastname_WeekX_Term_Year.html or ALY2100_FirstnameLastname_WeekX_Term_Year.pdf
If you use any existing code extracted from www, cite the source. Make sure the whole code runs without any bugs, and explain well what you did so I can be sure you understand and are learning the material. TurnItIn will pick up similarities, and depending on how you modify the code and give explanations, I can disregard the level of similarity.
Rubric
Biweekly Assignments
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComputation
40 pts
Almost all of the problems are computed correctly, and the logic is also correct
32 pts
Most of the problems are computed correctly and most of the logic makes sense
20 pts
Some of the problems are computed correctly and some of the logic makes sense
10 pts
Very few of the problems are computed correctly and the logic is poor
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Tools
40 pts
Uses the best and/or required procedures/formulas/tools to solve almost all of the problems
32 pts
Uses satisfactory and/or required procedures/formulas/tools to solve most of the problems
20 pts
Uses only a few procedures/formulas/tools to solve the problems
10 pts
Does not use satisfactory or required procedures/ formulas/tools to solve the problems
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of code and results
20 pts
Uses clear language to accurately express abstract ideas and explain concepts. No errors related to organization, or grammar.
16 pts
Uses clear language to express ideas, but not on all steps of the code. Minor errors related to organization, or grammar
10 pts
Lack of clarity in writing. And lack explanation on part of the code
