Module 14: Submit Peer Reviews of Professional Philosophy
Start Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 10
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
File Types doc, docx, and pdf
SUBMIT YOUR PEER REVIEWS OF TWO DRAFTS
You have submitted your Professional Philosophy papers to your small group discussion boards and decided who is reviewing whose papers. You have been working on those peer reviews.
When you complete the reviews, please upload those peer reviews and grade recommendations in two places: in your small group discussion board for your colleagues to see, and here, in the Module 14: Submit Peer Reviews of Professional Philosophy assignment portal for your instructor to review and provide grades.
The peer reviews you complete will be evaluated based on the criteria in the rubric at the bottom of this page.
Please ensure that your final peer reviews are based on the required components. To do so, please review the assignment’s instructions and rubrics which are provided below for your convenience.
COMPLETE YOUR PEER REVIEWS OF TWO DRAFTS
Provide respectful, constructive feedback for two people in your small group based on the Professional Philosophy Draft Grading Criteria for Peer Reviewers below. Use the assignment instructions to guide your feedback. Provide specific suggestions for your peers regarding how their submissions can be more aligned with the assignment’s instructions. Please provide your suggestion for the grade your peers should earn based on the grading criteria for the assignment in the table below. The instructor will assign final grades for the assignment based on student input and on student draft submissions.
Professional Philosophy Draft Grading Criteria for Peer Reviewers
Points
1. Student shares a complete draft in the discussion board that is based on the assignment’s required criteria:
-Identifies & discusses the writer’s understanding of the social work profession, personal lens, professional motivation, theoretical grounding
-Identifies & discusses the writer’s personal and professional growth
-Identifies & discusses the writer’s readiness for practice including a reflection of the 9 CSWE Core Competencies
-Identifies & discusses the writer’s professional development
-Identifies & discusses the writer’s professional leadership
-Identifies & discusses the writer’s career goals
-Identifies & discusses the writer’s next steps for professional development and lifelong learning
4
2. APA formatting and requirements are used throughout the submission.
-Uses professional language that becomes a professional social worker
-Writing is clear and understandable
-Correct APA formatting is used including correct use of in-text citations and references
-References and citations are used as needed
-Writing is free from grammatical and mechanical errors
-Writing uses non-biased, inclusive language
4
3. Submission is a minimum of 6 pages and a maximum of 8 pages and covers all required content areas
2
Total Points Available For You to Recommend For Papers You Review
10
As in all online communication, please consider the College of Social Work’s commitment to diversity Links to an external site.and keep in mind common respect for beliefs, culture, ethnicity, identity, etc. This is not just another course, it is a community of learners! Therefore our conversations with one another are some of the most important activities we will do in this class.
INSTRUCTOR’S GRADING OF YOUR PEER REVIEWS
The peer reviews you complete for two of your colleagues and upload to your small group discussion board will be graded according to the following rubric.
Peer Reviews of Professional Philosophy Draft Grading Criteria Points
1. Student provides respectful and constructive feedback to at least two other students on the assignment’s required contents.
-Feedback is specific and clear
-Feedback is based on the assignment’s rubric: Professional Philosophy Draft Grading Criteria for Peer Reviewers
-Feedback is based on the assignment’s instructions and required content areas
-Specific suggestions are included as needed
-A grade is recommended based on the rubric criteria
5
2. Student provides respectful and constructive feedback to at least two other students on APA formatting and clarity of writing/ideas.
-Feedback is specific and clear
-Feedback is based on the assignment’s rubric: Professional Philosophy Draft Grading Criteria for Peer Reviewers
-Feedback on the submission’s APA adherence is included
-Feedback on the submission’s writing requirements is included
-Specific suggestions are included as needed
-A grade is recommended based on the rubric criteria
5
Total Points Available for Your Peer Reviews
PreviousNext
