Module 12: Reflection on Ethics Roundtable Discussion
Start Assignment
Points 20
Submitting a file upload
File Types doc, docx, and pdf
Next Steps
After all small group discussions have taken place:
1. Each small group will upload their recording
2. Each small group will be assigned another small group’s roundtable discussion to view.
3. After viewing the assigned discussion, having already completed your own small group discussion, each individual will debrief and write up a short reflection on the process. The submission will include reflections on your own small group and on the small group you were assigned to view.
Reflection on Ethics Roundtable Discussion Instructions
Address all of the following points in your 2 page APA-formatted reflection:
Were you comfortable with the decision made by your small group? Why or why not? Was it the decision at which you would have arrived acting on your own?
How did your ethical decision making framework help you in the process?
What strategies did you/could you use to manage personal values when they conflict with the values of your profession or with the decision made by the panel?
In practice, how could /can you use supervision to enhance your ethical decision making skills?
What similarities and differences did you notice between your own small group’s discussion and the small group discussion you were assigned to view?
What strategies did you see members of the small group you were assigned to view using to solve the ethical dilemma? Were they effective? Why/why not?
Grading
The assignment will be graded according to the rubric below.
Rubric
Reflection on Ethics Roundtable Discussion Rubric
Reflection on Ethics Roundtable Discussion Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision outcome
-Submission discusses how comfortable student is with the small group’s ethical dilemma decision and why
-Discussion included on whether decision made by the group was the one at which student would have arrived acting alone
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthical decision-making frameworks
-Discussion of how ethical decision-making framework(s) helped in the decision-making process during the small group discussion
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManaging personal and professional value conflicts
-Describes strategies used or strategies that could be used to manage personal and professional value conflicts in regard to ethical decisions made by the small group
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of supervision
-Describes how supervision can be used to enhance ethical decision-making skills
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompare & contrast
-Identifies and describes similarities between student’s small group discussion and the assigned small group discussion viewed by the student
-Identifies and describes differences between student’s small group discussion and the assigned small group discussion viewed by the student
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthical dilemma solving strategies
-Identifies and describes strategies used by small group members in the assigned discussion viewed by student
-Discusses whether viewed strategies were effective and why/why not
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubmission uses APA formatting and adheres to professional writing requirements
-Submission is formatted correctly per APA rules
-Submission adheres to use of correct grammar and writing rules
-Submission is clear and easy to understand
2 pts
Total Points: 20
