Mississippi Educator and Administrator Growth System Evaluation. (MS-PGS)
Using the MS-PGS rubric, read the attached document in this module, (a) Teacher Growth Rubric Observation and Feedback Guidebook 2018-2019 to conduct a teacher evaluation using the standards. You will choose one of the two videos provided (either the lower grade or the upper grade) to conduct a mock teacher evaluation. When writing about your findings, including the grade level and subject area taught. Use the following guidelines and forms:
Select Scripting Form A that is attached int his module. (Guidebook, p 25-26)
Observation Evidence Sorting Form Option A for Domains II and III (Guidebook p. 27-33)
Write a two to three (2-3) paragraph report, using APA format to conduct a mock teacher evaluation using the current MDE evaluation tool, MS-PGS.
Please see the rubric below and the rubric in Appendix G in the syllabus.
Choose one of the two videos provided. Either a lower level or the upper level.
Conduct the mock observation using the rubric provided.
Share the results of the evaluation in a brief narrative form. You should be able to provide the required narrative information in two to three (2-3) paragraphs, as you are not retelling every aspect of the lesson.
You should also include a copy of the forms used (Scripting Form A and Sorting Form A), and the documentation you used during the evaluation. These forms should be filled out, not blank forms.
Paragraph one of the narrative form of the evaluation should briefly cover what occurred during the observation, also include the expected number of evaluations and what type is required in a given year using the MS-PGS.
Paragraph two should cover a reflection. How you felt during the evaluation, was the instrument easy to follow, and what difficulties you may have encountered, or found difficult to understand.
Please access the following links:
Choose one of the following teaching videos to use for your mock teacher evaluation using the MS-PGS.
3rd Grade
6th Grade
4th Grade
10th Grade Math
Mississippi Growth System
https://www.mdek12.org/OTL/OTC/professional-growth-system
Please note the purpose of this assignment is to allow you to experience what the expectations will be, as an administrator, to evaluate a teacher using the required tools and rubrics.
MS-EAPGS Mock Teacher Evaluation (1) (1)
MS-EAPGS Mock Teacher Evaluation (1) (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScripting Form
The correct Scripting Form A was used with accurate information. The upper informational portion was completed. Timestamps for the teacher and student EVIDENCE were used.
20 pts
10-20 Points
The correct Scripting Form A was used with accurate information. Timestamps with appropriate EVIDENCE were used. No judgment or feelings were used. No errors 20 Points One or more errors 10-19 Points
0 pts
0-9 Points
The correct Scripting Form A was used but did not contain evidence of what the teacher and students were doing, or there was not enough scripting provided to justify the requirements of the assignment. Timestamps were not provided and there was no EVIDENCE used. Several Errors 1-9 Points Numerous errors 0 Points
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe correct Sorting Form A was used. Evidence from the Scripting Form A, along with timestamps, were used in Domains II and III. A Score was given for each Domain II Standard 3 and 4, and Domains III Standards 5-7
20 pts
10-20 Points
The correct Sorting Form A was used. Evidence from the Scripting Form A, along with timestamps, were used in Domains II and III. A Score was given for each Domain II Standard 3 and 4, and Domains III Standards 5-7 No Errors 20 Points Evidence was provided with a score but timestamps were missing One or more errors 10-19 Points
0 pts
0-9 Points
The correct Sorting Form A was used but did not contain evidence from the scripting with timestamps. Timestamps were not provided and there was no EVIDENCE used, nor was a score assigned. Many Errors 1-9 Points Numerous Errors 0 Points
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNarrative Evaluations
Narrative: Evaluations
Based on the Guidebook and other information found on MDE’s website, Paragraph one of the narrative form of the evaluation should briefly cover what occurred during the observation, and also include the expected number of evaluations and what type is required in a given year using the MS-PGS.
20 pts
10-20 Points
Paragraph one of the narrative form of the evaluation briefly covered what occurred during the observation and also included the expected number of evaluations and what type is required in a given year according to MDE’s guidelines. No Errors 20 Points One or more Errors 10-19
0 pts
0-9Points
Paragraph one of the narrative form of the evaluation covered what occurred during the observation but was too brief to explain, and or did not include the expected number of evaluations and what type is required in a given year according to MDE’s guidelines Many Errors 1-9 Points Numerous Errors or off-topic 0 Points
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Paragraph Two
Narrative: Reflection
Paragraph two should cover a reflection. How you felt during the evaluation, was the instrument easy to follow, and what difficulties you may have encountered, or found difficult to understand.
20 pts
10-20 Points
The reflection clearly articulates the feelings and areas of difficulties, along with how it will help in their future as an educator. No Errors 20 Points More than one error 10-19 Points
0 pts
0-9 Points
The reflection does not clearly articulate the feelings and areas of difficulties, along with how it will help in their future as an educator. Many Errors 1-9 Points Numerous Errors or off-topic 0 Points
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA Format
Mechanics and APA Format
The paper uses correct grammar, sentence structure, APA format, and is the appropriate length.
20 pts
10-20 Points
No Errors 20 Points One or more Errors 10-19 Points
0 pts
0-9 Points
Numerous Errors 0-4 Points
20 pts
Total Points: 100
