Prologue
It’s not enough to be a scientist, or to be over reliant on one or two gifted scientists. Few scientists or physicians can bring things from their lab bench to the bedside. By now, you’re read the companion guide section on silos.
There are also many folks who claim unusual STEM expertise who are closer to crazy than quirky. The field attracts them. How do you separate a Matt Scholz and many others versus the crazies and the narrow scientists? A business-oriented innovator is needed, namely you.
This requests you think of avenues for a better Covid vaccine.
1. List one or two key attributes of an improved Covid vaccine. What specific advancement might achieve the better vaccine?
2. In doing so, feel free to make a single critique of our research / vaccine commercialization effort. Our scientists and national momentum were heroic but there’s always room to improve.
Take-Home Research Sources
You can consult anyone except your course instructional staff. You can consult product experts or analysts. You can consult teammates or other faculty. You may find interesting ideas on the web, yes, you can use something straight from the web. I expect, however, that you do a bit of collateral research to provide color on your guidelines.
There should be something original。
Take-Home Answer Research Source Examples
Although I am providing a lighthearted example, I am avoiding any potential collision with your answers.
1) Interview a biotech analyst who lives in a self-made mud-house in Woodinville.
50% of the grade is on readability and style. 25% of the grade is on whom you consult, or the sources you accumulated. You have a maximum length of ¾-page. The page count excludes your references and footnotes. You can also add an interview(s) summary in the appendix. If you use tables or bullet points, you can have up to 1.33 pages (less than half a second page). Don’t use less than 11-point font.
