Let me know if you have any questions about this assignment,
The submissions are a half-page statement and completion of Excel file.
Instructions:
Attached, please find the final exam case study you are required to complete by the noted due date:
Nautilus Case Study – Final Exam.pdfDownload Nautilus Case Study – Final Exam.pdf
Excel File: Nautilus Financials (EX3-4).xlsDownload Nautilus Financials (EX3-4).xls
NOTE: When generating the statement of cash flows for 2022, assume the following: Depreciation Expense = 8,615, Net Non-Cash Gain= 565. Note that there may be an amount related to foreign exchange fluctuations, which you can put in a “plug” line at the end to make the SOCF flow. I will be assessing your ability to take the financial information provided to construct this SOCF, an exact answer may not be possible, but I will assess your ability to use what is given (BS & IS and the latter information) to generate your estimated SOCF.
Submission Requirements: Submit a report in Word or PDF document. You are also required to submit your Excel file with your supporting calculations (Prospective Analysis, Ratios, Statement of Cash Flows). Failure to submit your supporting Excel file will result in a 25% penalty.
Below is the grading rubric I will use to assess your answers for each section of the case study final exam.
A (90-100%):
Demonstrates a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the case and its context
Provides highly insightful, thorough, and well-supported analysis for each question
Makes well-justified, strategic, and practical recommendations backed by strong evidence
Exhibits excellent critical thinking skills and the ability to synthesize information effectively
Presents ideas clearly, logically, and convincingly, with no errors in grammar or formatting
B (80-89%):
Shows a solid understanding of the case and its context
Provides detailed and well-supported analysis for most questions
Makes reasonable, justified recommendations backed by relevant evidence
Demonstrates good critical thinking skills and the ability to analyze information effectively
Presents ideas clearly and logically, with minimal errors in grammar or formatting
C (70-79%):
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the case and its context
Provides some analysis for each question, but may lack depth or sufficient supporting evidence
Makes recommendations with limited justification or connection to the analysis
Exhibits adequate critical thinking skills and the ability to analyze information
Presents ideas with some clarity, but may have some organizational or grammatical issues
D (60-69%):
Shows a limited understanding of the case and its context
Provides minimal or surface-level analysis for each question, lacking depth and supporting evidence
Makes poorly justified recommendations that may not align with the analysis
Demonstrates weak critical thinking skills and a limited ability to analyze information effectively
Presents ideas unclearly or with significant organizational and grammatical issues
