Learning Objectives
Critically evaluate a case study from a (singular) theoretical model selected from either the psychodynamic or humanistic domains, evidencing an understanding of at least two interventions associated with the model. The case study is to be chosen from any of the MACP Skills Learning Lab, Module 12, Case Study Central.
Develop an understanding of the elements of a case conceptualization.
Evidence understanding of the strengths and limitations of the theoretical model from a multicultural perspective.
Reflect upon how your chosen theoretical model aligns with your personal beliefs about how emotional difficulties develop and what fosters therapeutic change.
Purpose
To learn about analyzing a case study from either a psychodynamic or a humanistic theoretical perspective; and develop a case conceptualization that informs the use of at least two therapy interventions from that theoretical model.
Instructions
Briefly describe the client case and presenting problem in concise clinical terminology (do not restate the case study word for word – this is a summarized presentation of the client)
Discuss and apply the theoretical assumptions, principles, and foundations of the selected model to develop the case conceptualization. A case conceptualization, which is informed by the therapy’s theoretical foundation, includes what has contributed to a client’s symptoms, problems in living, maladaptive relational interactions, and what appears to maintain symptoms despite a client’s efforts to move beyond them. In their book, Case Conceptualization: Mastering this Competency with Ease and Confidence, Sperry and Sperry (2020) outlined three components of case conceptualization, including predispositions, protective factors, and perpetuants (pp.41-42).
Evaluate at least 2 interventions or techniques associated with this theoretical model that could be appropriately applied to the client case. Compose a short example of how these interventions could be applied in session. An example of an intervention, from a relational cyclical patterns approach (CCRT) would be assisting the client to identify problematic themes and patterns in interpersonal interactions across settings. Another would be helping to identify the wishes, needs and intentions they have in interactions with others.
Report possible limitations of using this model from a multicultural perspective.
Appraise your personal alignment with the selected model (i.e., how do you align with the theory’s assumptions, principles, or foundational beliefs?). Students can use the first-person writing style in this section.
Structure
Required components: Title page, and Reference page.
Length of Assignment: The text body of paper (i.e., not including references, title page or abstract) should consist of approximately 1500 words, (i.e., __(page range)___ double-spaced typed pages, Times New Roman font size: 12).
Format: Please, format your assignment in Word (files with extension .doc or .docx), or Rich Text Format (files with extension .rtf).
References: Minimum five peer-reviewed journal articles. At least three of these articles need to have been published in the last five-to-seven years. Seminal works can be used.
Template for assignment
Resources
Any sources used to support your written narrative should be cited using correct APA format. Although Wikipedia can be a useful starting place to gather very general information no Wikipedia references will be accepted as scholarly citations.
Use the Yorkville University Library and the EBSCO tool for academic search. It is important to select credible sources for assignments. This resource will assist students in determining which sources are credible: https://myyu.ca/ask/credible-source-guide/
Evaluation
The following rubric indicates those areas you should be focusing on in preparing your assignment, and how the professor will weigh these components relative to one another.
Criteria
% of Final Grade
1. Described the client case and presenting problem
/10
2. Applied theoretical assumptions, principles, and foundations of the selected theory
/25
3. Evaluated at least 2 theoretical interventions or techniques within the selected theory (examples provided)
/25
4. Assessed theoretical limitations through the lens of multiculturalism
/10
5. Appraised personal alignment with the selected theory /10
6. Quality of research (breadth & appropriately referenced sources) /10
7. Clarity of writing style, correct grammar, use of Canadian English spelling, and punctuation /5
8. Compliance with the APA style guidelines for general formatting, citations, and references /5
TOTAL
/100
