It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum word requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments unless specified in the instructions. All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.
Health information systems provide a variety of multi-faceted information to provide organizations with the ability to determine areas of strength and weakness. Using the Measure Evaluation Health Information System (HIS) Assessment Tools DatabaseLinks to an external site. website, choose one assessment tool for health information systems from the website for evaluation of the organization you are presently in practice.
Using the tool, assess the organization to the best of your capability.
Provide a summary of your evaluation.
Next, select one standard from the American Nurses Informatics Association and determine the alignment of the organization based on the evaluation information you gathered using the assessment tool.
Provide two QSEN aligned recommendations for the organization to use for improvement of the present health information system.
What data would you use from the evaluation to support or not support alignment with the standard?
Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.
