Instructions
In 2009, the National Academy of Science issued a report titled Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States A Path Forward. The report made thirteen recommendations, including the creation of an independent, scientific oversight entity for forensic science, investing in research and standards setting, addressing cognitive bias in the practice of forensic testing and educating judges and legal practitioners. Forensic science and governance is specifically address in recommendation 1 with the recommendation of an independent federal entity, the National Institute of Forensic Science (NIFS). In 2014 the National Science and Technology Council released a report titled Strengthening the Forensic Sciences that provided an update to the progress that had been made regarding the recommendations put forth in the 2009 National Academy of Sciences report.
Evaluation
Apply the readings and videos for the week when evaluating the strength of governance in the forensic sciences. Write a 1000 word essay that compares and contrasts the statements of each report regarding the state of governance in forensic science. See the Rubric below. Up to 90 points will be earned if the student addresses the following :
Determine and summarize each report’s position regarding the state of governance of forensic science.
Explain any recommendations if any that are made by each report regarding governance in forensic science
Evaluate and summarize how the recommendations from each report are expected to affect governance in the forensic sciences.
Evaluate each report’s argument, synthesize the information, and summarize each report’s position. Formulate and state your own opinion about the current state of governance in the forensic sciences. Include any recommendations that you agree with or believe should be implemented.
Links to articles are attached.
