I need to write a paper on this podcast “Is Religion a Force For Good” https://opentodebate.org/debate/is-religion-a-force-for-good/
I have written the first part but I only have 1 source that ive introduced and written about, their are two main interviewees and it is a paper that im supposed to write about their argument and how they use teh rhethorical devices in their arguments.The paper but considering it’s an argumentative paper I don’t believe it’ll be too long given it’s about biases and explanations. Being able to use 3 sources when two of them can be related to the same material but different perspectives is a bigger help as well, creating a safety buffer for those who find citations annoying or time consuming, having many things to watch out for seems redundant but it makes sense under certain guidelines and conditions, being able to also use charts regardless of how much space or characters it uses seems better for being able to explain why the argument is what it is and what it’s guiding towards in the long run.
1.This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome1. Logic
Logic was analyzed in the chosen argumentative text being analyzed. The existence or absence of logic was identified in the chosen text. logical fallacies were identified, and proof was given as to their presence with definitions.
2.This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome2. Knowledge of Rhetorical Devices
Paper shows the use of rhetorical language to indicate and identify the types of argument strategies and devices used in the argumentative text being analyzed. This shows the knowledge held by the author of the argument analysis.
3.This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome3. Identification of Rhetorical language use
Paper contained the identification of rhetorical language used in the chosen argumentative text, such as:
Emotive, slanted language, Figurative, abstract, cliches, slogans, vague/ambiguous terms, definitions by example, and extended definitions.
4.Three well utilized and presented sources
Your paper must contain at least 3 sources. One source should be the chosen source you are analyzing which should be introduced and explained to your readers. Sources must be correctly introduced as sources (author’s name, about author, article name and location of article) before they were paraphrased, quoted or summarized in the text.
5.Grammar/editing/transitions/Work Cited page/in-text citations
Author utilizes MLA style formatting throughout their Argument Research paper. Paper shows that the author edited for Grammar/transitions as well as included a correct Work Cited page/in-text citations
6.This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome7. A paper that contains 2000-3000 words
Argument Analysis Paper contains 2000-3000 words of analysis.
7.Work Cited page
Author utilizes MLA style formatting to include a correct separate Work Cited page listing all sources cited in the paper
