How might you use social media to promote quality care? How might social media influencing promote social change?
In this Assignment, you will explore the nurse as an influencer. What
might this look like? What is the impact, and what might be the ethical
and professional risks? You will reflect on and consider ways in which
you might construct a social media following by using a social media
medium to demonstrate how you might promote health.
To prepare:
Review the assigned Learning Resources in this module.
Reflect on the Nurses Code of Ethics in relation to nurses’ responsibility to support activities of social change.
Consider how you might construct a social media following and the medium you would use.
Select a social change topic on which to focus your social media campaign.
Review the role of influencers on social change.
Review the steps of being an influencer.
The Assignment
Construct a social media webpage, a media flyer, or a
video in which you act as an influencer of social change in the field
of nursing. Include the following in your medium of choice:
Explain the nurses’ responsibility in promoting health via social media.
Identify ethical and professional risks that need to be considered when using social media to promote health.
Draft and provide a clear message related to the social change topic selected.
Explain how you will repeat your message for emphasis and change. Be specific.
Explain how you will follow the steps of being an influencer. Be specific.
Identify who you might collaborate with. What impact might this collaboration make?
Learning Resources
Fowler, M. (2015). Guide to the code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements: Development, interpretation, and application
Links to an external site.. Health Education & Behavior, 48(2),
199–207.
https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.sagepub.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1177%2F1090198120974964
Links to an external site.
(2nd ed.). American Nurses Association.
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=nlebk&AN=1021763&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200
Gentry, H., & Prince-Paul, M. (2021). The nurse influencer: A concept synthesis and analysis Links to an external site.. Nursing Forum, 56(1), 181–187. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1111%2Fnuf.12516
Geraghty, S., Hari, R., & Oliver, K. (2021). Using social media in contemporary nursing: Risks and benefits Links to an external site.. British Journal of Nursing,
30(18), 1078–1082.
https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=rzh&AN=153015105&site=eds-live&scope=site&custid=s6527200
Harris, J., Atkinson, A., Mink, M., & Porcellato, L. (2021). Young people’s experiences and perceptions of YouTuber-produced health content: Implications for health promotion Health Education & Behavior, 48(2), 199–207.
https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.sagepub.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1177%2F1090198120974964
NURS_3021_Module6_Assignment2_Rubric
NURS_3021_Module6_Assignment2_Rubric
Criteria Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Explained nurses’ responsibility for promoting health via social media
16
to >12.0 pts
Masters Expectations
The response comprehensively and clearly explains nurses’ responsibility for promoting health via social media.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.
12
to >10.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
The response explains nurses’ responsibility for promoting health via social media.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the explanation.
10
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains nurses’ responsibility for promoting health via social media, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Identified ethical and professional risks to be considered when promoting health via social media
16
to >12.0 pts
Masters Expectations
The response comprehensively and clearly identifies risks to be considered regarding health and social media influencing.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the identification.
12
to >10.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
The response identifies risks to be considered regarding health and social media influencing.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the identification.
10
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The
response inaccurately and vaguely identifies risks to be considered
regarding health and social media influencing, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support
identification, or it is missing.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Constructed a clear message regarding a social change topic
16
to >12.0 pts
Masters Expectations
A clear message for social change is comprehensively and clearly constructed.
12
to >10.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
A message for social change is constructed.
10
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
An inaccurate or vague message for social change is constructed, or it is missing.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Explained how the message will be repeated for emphasis and change
16
to >12.0 pts
Masters Expectations
The
response comprehensively and clearly explains how the message will be
repeated. The response demonstrates how the repetition will create both
emphasis and change.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that
fully support the explanation.
12
to >10.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
The
response explains how the message will be repeated and demonstrates how
the repetition will create both emphasis and change.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that
support the explanation.
10
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The
response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the message will be
repeated and/or does not demonstrate how the repetition will create both
emphasis and change, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support
the explanation, or it is missing.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Explained how you will follow steps of being an influencer
16
to >12.0 pts
Masters Expectations
The response comprehensively and clearly explains how the steps of being an influencer will be followed.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanation.
12
to >10.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
The response explains how the steps of being an influencer will be followed.
The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the explanation.
10
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how the steps of being an influencer will be followed, or it is missing.
The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanation, or it is missing.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Professional writing: Context, organization, audience, purpose, tone, style, clarity, flow
10
to >7.33 pts
Masters Expectations
Demonstrates full awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose
Content is generally clear, logical, and well organized with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure.
Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias.
Style is consistently appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context.
Mostly free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors
7.33
to >6.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
Demonstrates some awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose
Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized with
adequate sentence and paragraph structure.
Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias.
Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context.
Contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
6
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Demonstrates minimal awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose
Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible organization; does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure.
Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias.
Style is inconsistent with a professional setting/workplace context.
Contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Professional writing: Originality, source credibility, and attribution of ideas
10
to >7.33 pts
Masters Expectations
Writing
fully reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to
reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to
support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references
in APA format.
7.33
to >6.0 pts
Achieves Expectations
Writing
adequately reflects original thought and paraphrasing and adheres to
reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to
support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references
in APA format.
6
to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
Writing
does not reflect original thought and paraphrasing and does not adhere
to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to
support a claim while incorporating appropriate citations and references
in APA format.
10 pts
Total Points:
100
