Hello, you have already provided me with an outline as in attached file, here is the tutors ccomment:
Outline looks good. You may want to discuss data requirements and options for each of the application area you’ve identified. Also the approaches to developing those applications whether supervised or unsupervised – challenges including a brief discussion of ethical issues and implications of the proposed solutions as well.
ill copy below the requirements once again
This assessment has a word limit of 1,500 words
A local start-up finance company is vaguely aware of AI and the potential benefits, as well as the harms that these technologies can cause to society. This has caused the Senior Management of the company to have some reservations about AI. As an Artificial Intelligence consultant, you are to present a report to persuade the management of the company to accept your idea to employ AI technologies to improve business processes for competitiveness.
Your report should identify three key areas to which the company could apply AI technologies to facilitate its operations and increase their return on investment. The report should also consider data needed, as well as the sort of approach that will be required to develop an AI system.
Your report to senior management should provide the following information. Note that the associated grading criteria are highlighted in the requirements below,
Details of the company and industry focus.
Details of the three key areas where AI technologies will aid operations and increase returns.
Details of the potential problems that can be encountered in employing AI technologies in these areas (Knowledge and Understanding weighted at 30%).
Information on the data required for the AI deployments you are recommending as well as the approaches that will be required for developing the AI system. You would need to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of any solution, with references to examples in which the technology has been employed (critically weighted at 30%).
The rest of the grading criteria for this assessment is as follows:
Use of relevant sources (weighted at 20%).
Structure and Presentation (weighted at 10%).
Academic Integrity (weighted at 10%).
