Hallmark Assignment: Concept Maps
Start Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 30
Submitting a file upload
This component of the Hallmark Assignment objectives include:
Research and complete concept maps of interrelated concepts that will be featured in the OMS scenario.
This week you will research, complete, and upload to Canvas 3 concept maps Download concept maps. A deeper understanding of these concepts and exemplars will help improve your performance when you complete the scenario for the second time. The concept maps are labeled with the concepts and exemplars: Glucose Regulation, Perfusion, and Clinical Judgment.
Assignment Instructions:
For the glucose regulation and perfusion concept maps:
For each box, consider adding the following information to BOTH clinical judgment maps to earn full points.
Pathophysiology: What is the underlying pathophysiology for the given exemplars?
Recognize Cues: Consider signs and symptoms, lab work, patient statements, H&P, and others. Include subjective and objective data.
Generate Solutions: What are the desirable outcomes? List SMART goals.
Take action: How should the intervention(s) be performed, requested, communicated, taught, etc.?
Evaluating Outcomes: What signs will point to improving/declining/unchanged status?
For the final concept map, research the assessments and tests used in the OMS scenario. Why is each of these applicable to the pregnant client?
Use bullet-points in a concept map. This is not a formal writing assignment, but you still must give credit to your sources at the bottom of the map(s). Use APA 7th edition format for your references. Please visit the Writing Center if you need assistance.
Rubric
300 level Hallmark rubric: Concept maps
300 level Hallmark rubric: Concept maps
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor the clinical judgment model concept maps (glucose regulation and perfusion):
Pathophysiology
5 pts
Full Marks
Pathophysiology is accurate and complete on both clinical judgment model concept maps for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and gestational hypertension. There is clear identification of the cellular or functional processes of both diseases.
2.5 pts
Partial Marks
Pathophysiology is accurate but missing key points for one or both of the concept maps.
0 pts
No Marks
Pathophysiology is missing in one or both concept maps, or the information documented is inaccurate.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor the clinical judgment model concept maps (glucose regulation and perfusion):
Recognize cues
5 pts
Full Marks
A minimum of six (6) signs and symptoms are identified that would be specific to the patient with each of the disease exemplars (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and gestational hypertension). Consider objective and subjective data.
2.5 pts
Partial Marks
Three (3) to five (5) signs and symptoms are identified that would be specific to the patient with each of the disease exemplars (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and gestational hypertension).
0 pts
No Marks
Zero (0) to two (2) signs and symptoms are identified that would be specific to the patient with each of the disease exemplars (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and gestational hypertension). Also choose this section if signs and symptoms identified for either map are inaccurate.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor the clinical judgment model concept maps (glucose regulation and perfusion):
Generate solutions
5 pts
Full Marks
Identify a minimum of 3 desirable health goals for clients with both Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and gestational hypertension. Goals should be in the SMART format.
2.5 pts
Partial Marks
One (1) or two (2) desirable health goals were identified for clients with both Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and gestational hypertension. Goals are listed in the SMART format.
0 pts
No Marks
Zero (0) health goals were identified on one of both maps. Also choose this section if any goals are not listed in SMART format.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor the clinical judgment model concept maps (glucose regulation and perfusion):
Take action
5 pts
Full Marks
Describe a minimum of six (6) nursing interventions appropriate for clients with each Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and gestational hypertension. Define how each interventions would be performed, requested, communicated, taught, etc.
2.5 pts
Partial Marks
Describe three (3) to five (5) nursing interventions appropriate for clients with each disease process (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and gestational hypertension). Learner will define how each intervention would be performed, requested, communicated, taught, etc.
0 pts
No Marks
Zero (0) to two (2) nursing interventions appropriate for each disease process is identified. Descriptions of how any intervention would be performed, requested, communicated, taught, etc. is missing or contains actions that would be detrimental to the health of the client.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor the clinical judgment model concept maps (glucose regulation and perfusion):
Evaluate outcomes
5 pts
Full Marks
Describe how the nurse will determine if the nursing interventions in the ‘Take Action’ section for both Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and gestational hypertension will be evaluated to determine their effectiveness. What signs would point to improving/declining/unchanged health status?
2.5 pts
Partial Marks
The learner is not able to describe how to evaluate interventions in one or both concept maps.
0 pts
No Marks
This information is missing from one or both maps OR the evaluation criteria is inaccurate.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor the assessment/test map:
Fetal monitoring, Leopold’s Maneuver, urinalysis, blood glucose testing, and medical/OB history
3 pts
Full Marks
Describe how each assessment or test would be performed on a pregnant client. Learner will provide rationale for performing each item as well as briefly discuss the desired outcomes for each assessment/test.
2 pts
Partial Marks
All sections are complete but key points are missing. Rationales or desired outcomes for each item is incomplete.
0 pts
No Marks
One or more sections is left blank OR the information in one or more section is inaccurate.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 7th edition format
2 pts
Full Marks
Reference(s) is/are cited from a textbook or peer-reviewed medical journal per APA guidelines. Sources are less than 5 years old.
1 pts
Partial Marks
Reference(s) is/are cited from a textbook or peer-reviewed medical journal. Sources are outdated, but an attempt to follow APA guidelines is made.
0 pts
No Marks
References are missing, or no attempt to follow APA guidelines was made.
2 pts
Total Points: 30
PreviousNext
