In 2-3 pages: I selected Borderline Personality Disorder
Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected disorder.
Explain your professional beliefs about this disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a patient that may present with this disorder.
Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to this disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.
NRNP_6675_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP_6675_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome In 2–3 pages, address the following: • Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected personality or paraphilic disorder.
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder.
13 to >11.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder.
11 to >10.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder.
10 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Or the response is missing.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about your selected disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.
17 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.
30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.
26 to >23.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.
23 to >20.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.
20 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Or the response is missing.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.
15 to >13.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
13 to >11.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
11 to >10.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.
10 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%–89%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriiptive.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%–89%
Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct APA format with no errors
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%–89%
Contains 1-2 APA format errors
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Contains 3-4 APA format errors
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Contains five or more APA format errors
5 pts
Total Points: 100
