Attn /Important : Can this assignment be provided to the same writer who will be completing Week 7: Clinical Practice Guideline Assignment. It’s a Part 2 of the assignment
https://community.chamberlain.edu/s/
username : for the assigned writer
Go to class
select the class
Modules the assignment will be under week 7
Week 7: Clinical Practice Guideline Peer Review
Points 50 Submitting a file upload
Purpose
A student peer review is a process in which students constructively evaluate the work of another student’s work which promotes mutual learning. Feedback provided from a peer can help the learner master the concepts of an assignment. At the same time, the peer who provides the feedback on a student assignment learns to critically analyze the learner’s work.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Evaluate common primary care clinical practice guidelines for application in clinical practice (WO7.1) (CO3)
Review and provide constructive feedback on a peer’s clinical practice guideline assignment. (WO7.1) (CO 3)
Due Date: Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 7
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
Total Points Possible: 50
Requirements:
The instructor will provide each student with the name of a peer whose assignment must be reviewed prior to Week 7.
The student will read the peer’s assigned CPG (which should be posted with every peer presentation).
Using the Peer Review Rubric provided, students will critically evaluate their assigned peer’s PowerPoint presentation.
Peer evaluations are due by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7. One (1) copy must be uploaded to the course. The second (2nd) copy should be sent via the course conversation inbox to the peer whose work was reviewed.
Preparing the paper
In this activity you are “grading” your peer’s presentation with the rubric that your instructor uses. Be mindful to follow any additional directions that are required as noted in the peer reviewer form.
The written peer review is to be completed on the corresponding Peer Review Template download.
Add your name and the name of the presenter that you are reviewing in the appropriate section.
Watch your assigned peer’s presentation.
Provide a “grade” for your peer by highlighting the box that you feel most represents the appropriate grade for each criteria.
Provide constructive feedback in the Peer Reviewer Comments section.
Discuss how the CPG that you reviewed can be applied to your clinical practice as stated in the rubric. You can include your response at the bottom of the peer reviewer template form.
Peer evaluations are due by Sunday 11:59pm MT of Week 7.
One (1) copy must be uploaded to the Peer Review assignment box.
One (1) copy should be emailed to the peer whose work was reviewed.
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category
Points
%
Description
Peer review
20
40%
The student “grades” a peer’s presentation based on the same rubric that the instructor uses for the assignment and thoughtfully provides constructive feedback.
Application to Practice
20
40%
The student discusses how the information learned in the peer presentation can be applied in their clinical practice rotation.
40
80%
Total CONTENT Points= 40 pts
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category
Points
%
Description
Format
10
20%
The peer evaluation is composed on the Peer Evaluation Template with clear and understandable comments
10
20%
Total FORMAT Points= 10 pts
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL=50 points
Rubric
Week 7 Peer Review Assignment_Sept19
Week 7 Peer Review Assignment_Sept19
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 40 Points
Peer Review
The student evaluates a peer’s presentation using the rubric for the assignment and provides thoughtful constructive feedback in all five areas.
*Constructive feedback implies that the student does not just state vague or general comments such as “well done” or “I agree”.
20 pts
Excellent
Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form AND Student provides constructive feedback to the peer in each of the 5 areas.
18 pts
V. Good
Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form BUT The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in 1 of the 5 areas.
16 pts
Satisfactory
Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form BUT The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in 2-3 areas.
10 pts
Needs Improvement
Student provides a “grade” in all areas of the rubric form BUT The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in 4 areas.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Student did not provide a “grade” in every area of the rubric form OR The nature of the feedback does not provide sufficient detail in all 5 areas OR The student does not complete this section
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication to Practice
The student analyzes the CPG and identifies three specific examples that can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice. This analysis is clearly stated as an addendum at the bottom of the template.
20 pts
Excellent
Student identifies three specific examples of how the CPG can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice AND The nature of the student’s response is meaningful and relative to the topic
18 pts
V. Good
Student identifies two specific examples of how the CPG can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice AND The nature of the student’s response is meaningful and relative to the topic
16 pts
Satisfactory
Student identifies one specific examples of how the CPG can be applied to or improve their own clinical practice AND The nature of the student’s response is meaningful and relative to the topic
10 pts
Needs Improvement
Student identifies one or more examples BUT The nature of the response is vague or irrelevant to the topic
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Student provides a response which contains no specific examples OR The student does not complete this section
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 10 Points
Format
Peer evaluation is written on the peer evaluation template. The evaluation is easy to understand with correct grammar, syntax, or spelling.
10 pts
Excellent
The peer evaluation template is used for the assignment AND The evaluation is easy to understand with very few (0-1) grammatical, syntax, or spelling errors
9 pts
V. Good
The peer evaluation template is used for the assignment AND The evaluation is easy to understand with a few (2-3) grammatical, syntax or spelling errors
8 pts
Satisfactory
The peer evaluation template is used for the assignment AND The evaluation is easy to understand with many (4-5) grammatical, syntax or spelling errors
5 pts
Needs Improvement
The peer evaluation template is not used for the assignment OR The evaluation is difficult to understand very many (6-9) grammatical, syntax or spelling errors
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The peer evaluation template is not used OR The evaluation is difficult to understand with 10 or more grammatical, syntax, or spelling errors OR The student does not complete this section.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
0 pts
Manual Deductions
0 pts
Manual Deductions
0 pts
Total Points: 50
