This will be a discussion post for my doctoral research ethics class. You must support your response with at least three new peer-reviewed articles, but can also cite any of the provided resources. For this particular assignment, using using McNamee, M. J., Olivier, S., & Wainwright, P. (2006). Research ethics in exercise, health and sports sciences. Routledge. &Steneck, N. H. (2007). Conflict of interest. In Introduction to the responsible conduct of research, respond to the following topic:
discuss a time when you personally dealt with an ethical dilemma. Identify what ethical principles were involved in this situation. In light of any new understandings that you learned during the course, discuss what you would have done differently, and/or what you would have done the same, and why. Include scholarly based literature and citations.
The expectation for satisfactory work is 400 – 500 words per topic with at least 3 current peer reviewed references utilized. Textbooks, blogs, magazine or internet articles, book chapters, or special reports, do not count toward the peer-reviewed minimum. Connections to the peer reviewed references should be used throughout your writing with in-text citations and matching reference citations.
Here are the places that you should be getting your peer-reviewed sources from:
Journal of Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Ethics and International Affairs
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
Public Health Ethics
American Journal of Bioethics
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Journal of Information Ethics
Journal of Applied Philosophy
Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics
Neuroethics
Clinical Ethics
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Ethics and Information Technology