Di Carli M. F. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for nuclear cardiology. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 26(4), 1043–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01774-0
Dorbala, S., Cuddy, S., & Falk, R. H. (2020). How to Image Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Practical Approach. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 13(6), 1368–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.07.015Links to an external site.
Glasenapp, A., Hess, A., & Thackeray, J. T. (2020). Molecular imaging in nuclear cardiology: Pathways to individual precision medicine. Journal of nuclear cardiology: official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 27(6), 2195–2201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02319-6Links to an external site.
Gopal, S., & Murphy, C. (2023). Nuclear Medicine Stress Test. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing.
Ruberg, F. L., Grogan, M., Hanna, M., Kelly, J. W., & Maurer, M. S. (2019). Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 73(22), 2872–2891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.003Links to an external site.
Takehana K. (2021). Importance of Visualizing Heart Failure With Nuclear Medicine Techniques. Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society, 85(11), 2109–2110. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0623
The review should be an organized and integrated presentation (relating studies to each other), not
simply a string of studies described like abstracts (see the literature review samples listed on the course
readings list). The paper needs to be a discussion of the elements of a topic, not simply a discussion of 5
articles. It should be organized by the ideas related to the topic, not simply a string of abstracts. The
articles selected should be the best studies found on a topic. In addition, any detail from a study that
seems relevant to the point being made should be included, such as sample size (to show that the
conclusions are based on a good representation of the population, and can be generalized), design
methods, data collection methods (that are valid and reliable), and any other important aspects of the
study that strengthen (or weaken) one’s trust in the conclusions of the article, but especially findings that
relate to the point you are trying to make.
