Creating a google Slides presentation: Is Marijuana good or bad for you?
Slide 1: Title slide for your presentation: -Clearly states an appropriate main title, of your choosing. -Clearly states the subtitle “Comparative Analysis of Rhetorical Approaches Taken When Constructing Arguments for Expert and Non-Expert Audiences.” -Name(s), Date, and Class. ( just create the title, I will fill in the other information)
Slide 2: Concisely explains the context, relevancy, method, and goal of the presentation.
Slide 3: -Provides the author’s name, relevant credentials, title of the text, publication medium and date, and relevant image. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 4: -Concisely summarizes the context for an unfamiliar audience, explains the author’s central argument, and demonstrates two of their supporting claims. (The slide’s visuals and text are supportive of what is verbally presented) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 5: -Sites multiple uses of a single rhetorical strategy, with direct quotes from the author, and clarifies the context of the quote. -Clearly explains the strategy and its appeal to Ethos, Pathos, or Logos. (The slide’s visuals and text are supportive of what is verbally presented) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 6: -Regarding Slide 5’s rhetorical strategy: -Determines the author’s assumptions regarding the audience. Evaluates the author’s argument given these assumptions. (The slide’s visuals and text are supportive of what is verbally presented) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 7: -Same as Slide 5, but with a second important rhetorical strategy; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 8: -Same as Slide 6, but with analysis that focuses on the Slide 7 rhetorical strategy.
Slide 9: -Provides the author’s name, relevant credentials, title of the text, publication medium and date, and relevant image.
Slide 10: -Concisely summarizes the context for an unfamiliar audience, explains the author’s central argument, and demonstrates two of their supporting claims. (The slide’s visuals and text are supportive of what is verbally presented) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 11: -Sites multiple uses of a single rhetorical strategy, with direct quotes from the author, and clarifies the context of the quote. -Clearly explains the strategy and its appeal to Ethos, Pathos, or Logos. (The slide’s visuals and text are supportive of what is verbally presented) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 12: -Regarding Slide 11’s rhetorical strategy: -Determines the author’s assumptions regarding the audience. Evaluates the author’s argument given these assumptions. (The slide’s visuals and text are supportive of what is verbally presented) …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. Slide 13: -Same as Slide 11, but with a second important rhetorical strategy; ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 14: -Same as Slide 12, but with analysis that focuses on Slide 13’s rhetorical strategy.
Slide 15: -Presents a short biography of a close friend that features relevant information relating to argumentation. Include what appeals to them and their thought process. (The slide’s visuals and text are supportive of what is verbally presented) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 16: -Develops a thoughtful reason for why one text will be more persuasive to your friend than the other. -Goes beyond superficial explanations (e.g. “my friend is a non-expert,” “TLDR,” “they don’t research,” etc… so obviously the non-expert text is best). -Evaluates the appeal and rhetorical strategies in relation to this specific audience (so your viewers understand why the rhetorical strategies you featured in Sections Two and Three will or won’t be successful for this person. -Cites evidence. (The slide’s visuals and text are supportive of what is verbally presented) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 17: -As above, develops a second thoughtful reason for why one text will be more persuasive to your friend than the other. -Likewise, goes beyond a superficial explanation. -Evaluates the appeal and rhetorical strategies in relation to this specific audience. -Cites evidence. (The slide’s visuals and text are supportive of what is verbally presented) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Slide 18: -In summation, considers the implications of your comparative rhetorical analysis. Explains the changes that you’d like to see experts adopt when they design arguments for a non-expert audience.
Slide 19: Works Cited and Image Credits. Links directly to articles. MLA. Working Permalinks. (this may be multiple slides depending on the number of entries).
