A essay arguing about media being a big part in the government. 1. W. Joseph Campbell. “The Media, Myth & Fake News: From Watergate to Today.” The Library of Congress. Accessed March 11, 2024. https://loc.gov/item/2021690626.
American University professor W. Joseph Campbell discusses the rise of “fake news” and the prevalence of media myths in this talk drawn from a new, expanded edition of his book “Getting It Wrong: Debunking the Greatest Myths in American Journalism.”
2. “Silencing Turkey’s Media.” Human Rights Watch, March 28, 2023. https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/12/15/silencing-turkeys-media/governments-deepening-assault-critical-journalism.
Jailed journalists and media workers in Turkey. ” … Documents five important components of the crackdown on independent domestic media in Turkey, including the use of the criminal justice system to prosecute and jail journalists on bogus charges of terrorism, insulting public officials, or crimes against the state. Human Rights Watch also documented threats and physical attacks on journalists and media organizations; government interference with editorial independence and pressure on media organizations to fire critical journalists; the government’s takeover or closure of private media companies; and restrictions on access to the airwaves, fines, and closure of critical television stations.”–Publisher’s description.
3. The Avalon Project : Congressional record house : Anti-hoax terrorism act of 2001; December 11, 2001. Accessed March 11, 2024. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/sept11/cr_054.asp.
This source is a document from the Congressional Record House dated December 11, 2001, titled the “Anti-Hoax Terrorism Act of 2001.” It discusses the issue of fake news or hoaxes that were prevalent in the media following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The document likely provides legislative measures aimed at addressing the dissemination of false information that could incite fear or panic among the public during a time of heightened national security concerns. This source could be valuable for understanding the legal and legislative responses to the spread of misinformation in the aftermath of significant events such as terrorist attacks.
Secondary Sources:
1. “Research by Subject: Journalism & Media Studies: FACT Checking & Media Watchdog Groups.” Fact Checking & Media Watchdog Groups – Journalism & Media Studies – Research by Subject at San Diego State University. Accessed March 11, 2024. https://libguides.sdsu.edu/c.php?g=447716&p=3080925.
The mass media’s influence on the ethics of public life, as characterized by the press’s watchdog role in monitoring the conduct of government officials, is assumed to be vital to democracy. The effectiveness of this watchdog role is less clearly understood. Partial answers are found in the evolving institutional history of the press, including its control, ethics, laws, technology, organization, and the content of news stories. Just as reporters rarely discuss their ethics in terms of teleology and deontology, the press does not conceptualize in sophisticated terms its impact on the ethics of public employees. It traditionally finds motivation from the popular belief in watchdog success models from muckraking to Watergate. As partisanship, news values, and reporting techniques evolve, effectiveness varies. Research sheds light on media trends but focuses more on presidents than county clerks, more on political campaigns than government process. Optimism, as new doors and new technology open to reporters, is tempered by competition from the marketplace and the new digital feast promised consumers.
2. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election on JSTOR. Accessed March 12, 2024. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44235006.
This source is an article available on JSTOR, focusing on the relationship between social media and fake news during the 2016 election. Given the increasing influence of social media platforms as sources of information and the proliferation of fake news during the election period, this article likely examines the impact of misinformation spread through social media channels on the political landscape. The content likely includes analyses of specific instances of fake news, its dissemination patterns, and its potential effects on voter perceptions and behavior. This source could be valuable for understanding the role of social media in shaping public discourse and political outcomes, particularly in the context of contemporary elections and information dissemination.
3. Unpacking fake news from fake news:: National security in the … Accessed March 12, 2024. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep17648.5.
Focusing on the topic of fake news and its implications for national security. The title “Unpacking Fake News from Fake News” suggests that the content may delve into the complexities of identifying and addressing fake news within the context of national security concerns. The article likely explores various dimensions of fake news, such as its dissemination, impact on public perceptions, and potential threats to national security. Given the growing recognition of fake news as a significant societal challenge, particularly in the realm of security and information warfare, this source could provide valuable insights into strategies for mitigating the spread of misinformation and safeguarding national interests.
4. Legislating fake news: Global case studies from countering fake … Accessed March 12, 2024. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep17646.5.
focusing on the legislative responses to fake news globally. The title “Legislating Fake News: Global Case Studies from Countering Fake …” suggests that the content may provide insights into various countries’ approaches to combating fake news through legal frameworks and regulations. The article presents case studies from different regions, highlighting the diverse strategies employed to address the proliferation of misinformation and its potential societal impacts. Given the increasing concerns surrounding the spread of fake news and its implications for democracy, this source could offer valuable comparative perspectives on legislative initiatives aimed at safeguarding the integrity of information and public discourse worldwide. THESE ARE THE RESOURCES
