Select a research article related to nursing and write a 2-3 double spaced page (NOTincluding the title page and references) article evaluation

A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍ssignment: Research Article EvaluationInstructions:Select a research article related to nursing and write a 2-3 double spaced page (NOTincluding the title page and references) article evaluation. •Use only scholarly/professional, peer-reviewed articles written within the last 5 years•You must choose your article by the end of week 2 and show it to your instructor for approval•Use only scholarly/professional, peer-reviewed references. Do not use Wikipedia or internet sources that are not officially recognized as authority websites, as such websites are not scholarly sources. Also, keep in mind that not every .org domain is an authoritative website. •2-3 double spaced page (NOTincluding the title page and references)•In your evaluation, address each of the following components: oThe author(s),their credentials, and practice areasoThe purpose of the studyoPurpose of the articleoResearch question(s) oReview of the literatureoPopulation, sample size, and sample selection process oResearch method(s) used in the study oResearch findings oArticle critiqueoDiscussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice.•Written in current APA format. This paper should include: oFormal components including title pageoAPA headers (include page numbers)oAPA formatted headings in the body of the paperoAppropriate in-text reference citationsoA reference page, in correct APA formatAll assignments are expected to be submitted by the due to written assignment’sguidelines in the assignments without faculty consultation and consent may result in a penalty of (5) points per college day past due on any written to submit a written assignment and/or consistent lateness can result in a grade of “0” or “F”. Galen College of Nursing –NSG 3000 Syllabus –Version Article Evaluation Grading Rubric:CriteriaExcellent (10)Satisfactory (8)Needs Improvement (6)Non-Performance (0)Author(s), their credentials, and practice areas The author(s), their credentials, and practice areas are clearly and thoroughly author(s), their credentials, and practice areas are identified briefly; however, are not author(s), their credentials, and practice areas are partially of the author(s), their credentials, and practice (10)Satisfactory (8)Needs Improvement (6)Non-Performance (0)Purpose of the study The purpose of the study contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of purpose of the study contains specific information, but brief explanation. There are minor lapses in the description of the purpose. The purpose of the study is minimally explained. There are major lapses in the description of the purpose or it is not clearly explained. Absence of the purpose of the study. CriteriaExcellent (10)Satisfactory (8)Needs Improvement (6)Non-Performance (0)Research question(s) The research question(s) are clearly and thoroughly research question(s) are identified briefly; however, are not research question(s) are partially of the research question(s).CriteriaExcellent (10)Satisfactory (8)Needs Improvement (6)Non-Performance (0)Review of the literature The review of the literature contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of review of the literature contains specific information, but brief explanation. There are minor lapses in the description of the information. The review of the literature is minimally explained. There are major lapses in the description of the literature review or it is not clearly explained. Absence of the review of the (10)Satisfactory (8)Needs Improvement (6)Non-Performance (0)Population, sample size, and sample selection processThepopulation, sample size, and sample selection processcontain specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of population, sample size, and sample selection processcontain specific information, but brief explanation. There are minor lapses in the description of the information. The population, sample size, and sample selection processare minimally explained. There are major lapses in the description of the population, sample size, and sample selection process or they are not clearly explained. Absence of thepopulation, sample size, and sample selection (10)Satisfactory (8)Needs Improvement (6)Non-Performance (0)Research method(s) The research method(s) contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of research method(s) contains specific information, but brief explanation. There are minor lapses in the description of the information. The research method(s) is minimally explained. There are major lapses in the description of the research meth‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍od(s) or it is not clearly explained. Absence of the research method(s). CriteriaExcellent (10)Satisfactory (8)Needs Improvement (6)Non-Performance (0)Research findings The research findings contain specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of research findings contain specific information, but brief explanation. There are minor lapses in the description of the information. The research findings are minimally explained. There aremajor lapses in the description of the research method(s) or it is not clearly explained. Absence of theresearch (10)Satisfactory (8)Needs Improvement (6)Non-Performance (0)Article CritiqueThe article critique contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of article critique contains specific information, but brief explanation. There are minor lapses in the description of the information. Thearticle critique is minimally explained. There are major lapses in the description of the research method(s) or it is not clearly explained. Absence of theresearch (10)Satisfactory (8)Needs Improvement (6)Non-Performance (0)Discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice.(CSLO 2, 3)The discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice contains specific, thorough information and explanation. No lapses in logical progression of discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice contains specific information, but brief explanation. There are minor lapses in the description of the information. The discussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing practice is minimally explained. There are major lapses in the description of the research method(s) or it is not clearly explained. Absence of thediscussion of how the information in the article might be useful in future nursing (10)Satisfactory (8)Needs Improvement (6)Non-Performance (0)APASkillful and proficient writing using appropriate spelling, grammar, punctuation and mechanics, and APA style and formatting of the title page, headers, page numbers, headings in the body of the paper, appropriate in-text reference citations, and reference page. Written in 2-3 double spaced ,grammar,punctuationandmechanics,andAPAstyleandformatting of the title page, headers, page numbers, headings in the body of the paper, appropriate in-text reference citations, and reference page witha few errorsorlapses. Written in 2-3 double spaced ,grammar,punctuationandmechanics,andAPAstyleandformatting of the title page, headers, page numbers, headings in the body of the paper, appropriate in-text reference citations, and reference page witha moderate number oferrorsorlapses. Written in less than 2 or greater than 3 double spaced ,grammar,punctuationandmechanics,andAPA Points10080600 Framework forHow to Read and Critique a Research the research –Does it accurately describe the article? –Is it representative of the article? –Does it make the purpose of the article clear? of the problem –Is the problem properly introduced? of the study –Has the reason for conducting the research been explained? question(s) –Is/are the research question(s) clearly defined and if not, should they be? framework –Is the theoretical framework described? If there is not a theoretical framework, should there be? review –Is the literature review relevant to the study, comprehensive, and include recent research?Does the literature review support the need for the study? –Is the design appropriate for the study?Does the sample fit with the research design and is the size sufficient?Was a data collection instrument needed?How weredata collected?Werereliability and validity accounted for? –Is the analytical approach consistent with the study questions and research design? –Are the results presented clearly in the text,tables and figures? Are the statistics clearly explained? -Are the results explained in relationship to the theoretical framework, research questions, and the significance to nursing? –Are the limitations presented and their implications discussed? –Are there recommendations for nursing practice, future research, andpolicymakers? the level and quality of the evidence using a scale (several can be found in ANA’s Research Toolkit if the study is applicableto your you use the results and recommendations in your practice? **Use the at‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍tached document as the peer reviewed research article**