This is about two thrids editing/profreading/paper improvement and a little bit of new content generation for an undergraduate capstone is in support of the thesis/subject “research aimed to investigate how meditation and music therapy can help reduce stress and anxiety among college students, part or full time, who are also full-time workers. I have existing content attached in two documetns that I would like edited/combined. I have my draft, and I have the draft of a prior order. They are similar and overlap, but are not the same. I am looking for the documents to be combined, text improved, some additional content generated. The abstract could benefit from a clearer articulation of the research design, including a brief mention of the mixed-methods approach and the main findings. Please add in specific outcomes, such as the effectiveness of combined therapy versus individual therapies to provide a more comprehensive summary. The background section needs to be better organized to differentiate between meditation and music therapy’s individual effects and their combined impact. Also, including a brief discussion on the limitations or gaps in existing research would set the stage for the “study’s” research contribution (little as its an unfunded undergraduate studnet capstone.) One section could also benefit from a more critical analysis of the studies mentioned, highlighting any methodological strengths or weaknesses. The methods section could be more detailed in describing the study design e.g., recruitment process for participants, the specific content of the surveys and interviews, and the duration of the intervention sessions should be clearly outlined. Also needed is to describe the criteria for participant selection and the rationale behind the chosen methods. When you do get to the results section, it should include specific quantitative/qualitative results, how they connect back to the literature, and whether the synthesized results support/refute your hypotheses. Something should also acknowledge any limitations related to the data collection or analysis, such as sample size, potential biases, or the inability to control certain variables. (I have some of that already in the draft.) the references need put in order and properly cited on the references page. Please extrapolate the best as possible with the specific data points and findings; I will edit the specifics as needed, and I have them offline. No new citatios are being requested. Production needs pass multiple AI detectors and Plagiarism checks.
