Contact an individual from the cultural group selected in module two {Hispanic}
(with their consent) and conduct a cultural interview.
This interview can be in person, over the phone, or through a video call.
The individual can be a patient, neighbor, grandparent, in-law, or friend. Do not use your parent, brother, sister, spouse, or significant other.
Respect the interviewee’s privacy and cultural beliefs.
Use the interview questions developed in Module 2 based on Module 1’s mind map and the textbook’s FIG. 1.1 and FIG. 1.2 in Chapter 1 as the blueprint and guide for your interview.
Take notes during the interview to capture the key points discussed.
Use voiceover PowerPoint, Canvas Studio Screen Capture, Teams, or Zoom to narrate the PowerPoint presentation you will create to share the interview results.
Be sure to answer the following questions in the presentation:
Did your preconceptions or stereotypes influence the interview process?
What cultural factors emerged during the interview that could impact healthcare decisions?
How might you adapt your nursing practice to provide culturally competent care for individuals from this cultural group based on the interview insights?
Submission Instructions:
The presentation is to be original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citations and references.
The PowerPoint presentation should consist of 10-15 slides and be 10-15 minutes in length. Use voiceover PowerPoint, Canvas Studio Screen Capture, Teams, or Zoom to narrate the PowerPoint presentation.
Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).
Book: Giger, J. N., & Haddad, L. (2021). Transcultural Nursing: Assessment and Intervention (8th ed.). St.
Louis, MO: Elsevier. ISBN: 9780323695541
Presentation Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Identification of Main Issues/Problems
4 pts
Distinguished
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.
3 pts
Excellent
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.
2 pts
Fair
Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
1 pts
Poor
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
0 pts
No Submission
/ 4 pts
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms
4 pts
Distinguished
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
3 pts
Excellent
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.
2 pts
Fair
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
1 pts
Poor
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
0 pts
No Submission
/ 4 pts
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding
4 pts
Distinguished
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.
3 pts
Excellent
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
2 pts
Fair
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
1 pts
Poor
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
0 pts
No Submission
/ 4 pts
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature
4 pts
Distinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.
3 pts
Excellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
2 pts
Fair
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
1 pts
Poor
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.
0 pts
No Submission
/ 4 pts
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
view longer description
4 pts
Full Marks
Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.
3 pts
Excellent
Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
2 pts
Fair
Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
1 pts
Poor
Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
0 pts
No Submission
/ 4 pts
Total Points: 0
