Respond to one colleague by reflecting on the similarities and differences between your agency’s primary assessment tool and theirs.
1-JES Operation PAR is an outpatient clinic that provides harm reduction and MAT treatment to clients along with counseling. Upon admission, the counselor starts a pre-intake screening assessment of the new client which is then following with an assessment by the medical staff and doctor. The scope of practice and mission is to assess the behavioral and mental needs of the client to provide evidence-based based including trauma-informed care, telehealth, and person-centered counseling to provide the utmost services to the clients. The goals are designed based on the information that is provided through the assessment process that involves the client’s background information, behaviors and symptoms checklist, medical history, Psychiatric health history, risk and safety, adolescent development, parents’ information, and background/environmental setting, strengths, and weakness for the client and what recommended services that the therapist recommends for the client care needs. This assessment focuses on every aspect that the individual is enduring in their life, even the changes happening in the household settings. The assessment process is very thorough and even covers the development stages of their life and so forth. The tool does not address cultural or diversity differences with it. If the clients want to share that information, they are more than welcome to do so. The tool is used to help understand the client’s current status on behavioral health/mental health issues and the changes and causes of the issue, history/trauma events that may have occurred, and what goals the clients want to accomplish while in therapy. The tool has been implemented for at least five years now. The assessment tool is accessible for the clinicians to access it during the evaluation process with the clients.
MINES-
Describe the extent to which the tool reflects the agency’s scope of practice and mission.
The PSR intake evaluation appears to be consistent with the agency’s scope of practice and aim of serving people with significant mental illnesses while enhancing their functionality and independence (Voss & Das, 2024). The assessment addresses critical areas such as mental health, behavioral symptoms, education/work abilities, ADL functioning, trauma history, and strengths/difficulties relevant to psychosocial rehabilitation.
Identify any gaps in the assessment. Who or what is missing?
The existing based on this assessment include the limited evaluation of the physical health or medical conditions; the minimal exploration of the family or social support systems; absence of the standardized screening instruments for particular disorders; limited evaluation of the substance use history; and lack of explicit evaluation about the risk factors or safety concerns.
Explain how the tool addresses diversity or cultural differences.
The assessment tool’s apparent lack of dedicated sections or specific inquiries regarding cultural background, language preferences, or other diversity factors represents a significant oversight in its design, as incorporating these elements would not only enhance the tool’s cultural competence but also provide a more comprehensive understanding of the client’s unique needs, potential barriers to care, and culturally-appropriate treatment strategies, consequently resulting in more effective and tailored psychosocial rehabilitation interventions that respect and address the diverse experiences and perspectives of the individuals seeking care.
Describe the extent to which the tool prepares you to understand client needs.
While the assessment tool provides a useful preliminary view of the client’s mental status, symptomatology, functional capacity, and personal history, its concise nature may limit its ability to capture the full depth and nuance of more complex cases (Voss & Das, 2024). It necessitates supplementary evaluations or more comprehensive assessments to gain a thorough understanding of intricate client needs, especially in situations where multifaceted issues, comorbidities, or exceptional situations that needs exhaustive detailed inquiry of the psychological, social, and environmental aspects of the client.
Identify how long your agency has used the tool.
There is evidence of absent of information related to the duration of the use of the agency in the assessment form. Consequently it necessitates further inquiry with organizational leadership or a thorough examination of internal documentation to ascertain its historical implementation (Voss & Das, 2024). This could provide valuable insights into the tool’s evolution, effectiveness, and potential areas for improvement based on long-term application and feedback from clinicians and clients alike, ultimately contributing to a more competitive awareness of the evaluation’s role in the organization’s psychosocial rehabilitation program.
