Should individuals have the right to decide the time and
manner of their death through medical-assisted suicide? This contentious issue
has sparked debate among lawmakers, medical professionals, and the public. It
is important to note that medical-assisted suicide, also known as voluntary
euthanasia, is different from non-voluntary euthanasia, which is the act of
ending a person’s life without their consent. While some argue that
medical-assisted suicide is a compassionate possibility for those suffering
from terminal illnesses, others believe it goes against the ethical principles
of the medical profession. In this paper, I will argue in favor of
medical-assisted suicide, highlighting the importance of autonomy, reducing
suffering, and respecting individual choice.
One of the key arguments in favor of medical-assisted
suicide is the concept of autonomy. Individuals should have the right to make
decisions about their bodies and quality of life, particularly when facing a
terminal illness that will inevitably lead to a painful and undignified death.
For instance, consider the case of my great-grandfather Roy, who was diagnosed
with heart failure. By allowing patients like my great-grandfather Roy to
choose when and how they die, we are respecting their autonomy and empowering
them to support a sense of control over their own lives.
Furthermore, medically assisted suicide can help alleviate
suffering. For individuals with terminal illnesses, the physical and emotional
pain can be excruciating, a reality with which we must empathize. No amount of
medication or palliative care can truly lessen this suffering. In these cases,
medical-assisted suicide can offer a humane and dignified way to end the pain
and allow the individual to die with dignity.
It is also crucial to consider the principle of individual
choice. Each person has their values, beliefs, and preferences about
end-of-life care, a fact that we must respect. By denying individuals the possibility
of medical-assisted suicide, we are imposing our values and beliefs on them.
“It is essential to respect individuals’ autonomy and personal choice when
making decisions about their own lives,” particularly in situations as
personal and sensitive as end-of-life care.
In conclusion, medical-assisted suicide is a complex and
controversial issue that raises essential questions about autonomy, suffering,
and individual choice. While some may argue that it goes against the ethical
principles of the medical profession, it is a compassionate and respectful possibility
for individuals facing terminal illness. By allowing patients to make their own
decisions about their end-of-life care, we are not just honoring but
championing their autonomy, reducing suffering, and respecting their individual
choices. Medical-assisted suicide can offer a humane and dignified possibility
for those who are suffering and deserve to die on their own terms.
