The following rubric is how I was graded on this assignment. The comments include the revisions that need to be made. I attached the submitted assignment below. This is the turned in assignment that only needs revisions.
| Criteria | Proficient |
Needs Improvement |
Not Evident |
Criterion Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Budget: Statements |
8.63 points Selects and comprehensively defends the appropriate financial statements for use in the proposal |
6.47 points Selects and defends financial statements for use in the proposal, but statements are not appropriate or not comprehensively defended |
0 points Does not select and defend financial statements for use in the proposal |
Score of Budget: Statements, 6.47 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Selected, but the CLINIC’S FINANCIALS ARE NOT DEFENDED! Defense = $$$$$ |
||||
|
Budget: Expenses |
8.63 points Accurately identifies the major expenses associated with the proposal and the budgetary accounts that would be impacted |
6.47 points Identifies the major expenses associated with the proposal and the budgetary accounts that would be impacted, but identification is not accurate |
0 points Does not identify the major expenses associated with the proposal and the budgetary accounts that would be impacted |
Score of Budget: Expenses, 6.47 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Issues: #1: Financial confusion between Operating Budget and Capital Budget. #2: Personal Glucose monitoring devices has not been clearly and financially defined other than $600,000. Note: That amount will be paid by Medicare, Medicaid, all other federal & state agencies, as well as all private insurances. #3: Will there be ‘off-site’ distant monitoring by the clinic? #4: No provision for: WHAT Grant funding? Please list the federal, state Grant # and or private organization that will be finding. Also note that ‘Grant Funding is NOT REVENUE’. For example, when a parent gives their child $$$$, it is not considered revenue to the child. |
||||
|
Budget: Budgetary Accounts |
8.63 points Identifies what budgetary accounts are impacted and clearly states how |
6.47 points Identifies what budgetary accounts are impacted but does not state how they are impacted |
0 points Does not identify which budgetary accounts are impacted or state how |
Score of Budget: Budgetary Accounts, 6.47 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Issues: #1: Financial confusion between Operating Budget and Capital Budget. #2: Personal Glucose monitoring devices has not been clearly and financially defined other than $600,000. Note: That amount will be paid by Medicare, Medicaid, all other federal & state agencies, as well as all private insurances. #3: Will there be ‘off-site’ distant monitoring by the clinic? #4: No provision for: WHAT Grant funding? Please list the federal, state Grant # and or private organization that will be finding. Also note that ‘Grant Funding is NOT REVENUE’. For example, when a parent gives their child $$$$, it is not considered revenue to the child. |
||||
|
Budget: Reasoning |
8.63 points Justifies why the selected budgetary accounts were chosen for adjustment based on analysis of previous year’s budget |
6.47 points Justifies why the selected budgetary accounts were chosen for adjustment, but not based on previous year’s budget |
0 points Does not justify why the selected budgetary accounts were chosen for adjustment |
Score of Budget: Reasoning, 6.47 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Issue: In need of medical reasoning for the purchases. Google: reasoning for diabetes monitoring Results: 12,400,000 |
||||
|
Budget: Ratios |
8.63 points Selects appropriate ratios to use for support of the proposal and justifies logically |
6.47 points Selects and justifies ratios to use for support of the proposal, but does not select appropriate ratios or justification is not logical |
0 points Does not select and justify ratios to use for support of the proposal |
Score of Budget: Ratios, 8.63 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Excellent. |
||||
|
Budget: Ratio Calculations |
8.63 points Calculates the selected ratios based on the budget statement analysis |
6.47 points Calculates the selected ratios, but not based on the budgetary statement analysis |
0 points Does not calculate the selected ratios |
Score of Budget: Ratio Calculations, 0 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Missing Calculations. Calculations are ‘not’ the formula, Oxford dictionary: A calculation is something that you think about and work out mathematically. Calculation is the process of working something out mathematically. |
||||
|
Budget: Projected Departmental Budget |
8.63 points Creates a projected budget that applies the proposed changes to the specific department |
6.47 points Creates a projected budget but is missing key elements of a departmental budget |
0 points Does not create a departmental budget applying the proposed changes to a specific department |
Score of Budget: Projected Departmental Budget, 6.47 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Issues: #1: Financial confusion between Operating Budget and Capital Budget. #2: Personal Glucose monitoring devices has not been clearly and financially defined other than $600,000. Note: That amount will be paid by Medicare, Medicaid, all other federal & state agencies, as well as all private insurances. #3: Will there be ‘off-site’ distant monitoring by the clinic? #4: No provision for: WHAT Grant funding? Please list the federal, state Grant # and or private organization that will be finding. Also note that ‘Grant Funding is NOT REVENUE’. For example, when a parent gives their child $$$$, it is not considered revenue to the child. |
||||
|
Proposal: Options |
8.63 points Provides reasonable implementation options for each proposal item |
6.47 points Provides implementation options for each proposal item, but options are not reasonable |
0 points Does not provide implementation options for each proposal item |
Score of Proposal: Options, 8.63 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Excellent. |
||||
|
Proposal: Financial Research |
8.63 points Describes the cost-benefit of the listed options based on relevant research and information |
6.47 points Describes the cost-benefit of the listed options, but with gaps in relevant research and information |
0 points Does not describe the cost-benefit of the listed options |
Score of Proposal: Financial Research, 6.47 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Cost of Options? $$$$ |
||||
|
Proposal: Organizational Resources |
8.63 points Accurately and clearly identifies the organizational resources that will be needed for proposal implementation |
6.47 points Identifies the organizational resources that will be needed for proposal implementation, but lacks accuracy or clarity |
0 points Does not identify the organizational resources that will be needed for proposal implementation |
Score of Proposal: Organizational Resources, 8.63 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Excellent. |
||||
|
Proposal: Communication |
8.63 points Proposes methods for communicating budgetary changes and communicating throughout proposal implementation to departments across the organization, and justifies the appropriateness of these methods |
6.47 points Proposes methods for communicating budgetary changes and communicating throughout proposal implementation to departments across the organization, but does not justify the appropriateness of these methods |
0 points Does not propose methods of communication for notifying departments across the organization and for proposal implementation |
Score of Proposal: Communication, 8.63 / 8.63 |
|
Criterion Feedback Excellent. |
||||
|
Articulation of Response |
5.07 points Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization |
3.8025 points Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas |
0 points Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas |
Score of Articulation of Response, 5.07 / 5.07 |
|
Criterion Feedback Excellent. |
||||
Total Score of Final Project Milestone Two: Departmental Budget and Outline Guidelines and Rubric,
78.41 / 100
The following guidelines and rubric are the guidelines for the project.
