I’m uploading a new file, “Chapter 2 June feedback,” with all the comments. Please use track changes or highlight what has been changed to avoid miscommunication or misunderstanding, and below are a couple of previous additional comments to make sure it has been reflected: Chapter one comments: • Summary critics (making the connection between the authors) the big picture before the summary, the summary might be good but the before that need to present in a doctorate level. • Real life problem from newspaper and articles referencing. • The comments of pre-2012, I might find a framework that might helpful for me to use for me, there might be some work on role stain theory and role stress unpacks the role theory • Adopt the systematic review without mentioning that. • Add publication and magazine (rementining and linking whatever has been put in chapter one, so link the chapters together without having disconnect between chapters, feel free to add the supporting report and magazine in chapter one reference it in chapter two if needed. • Why I came with theses themes. • The way of presenting “Gaps in Previous research” is not the best way, I should put my contribution to practice, not listing the themes. • Context alone is not a study, we are not aiming to repetitively the • If there is a framework somewhere there and add to it. • Presenting the theory is must in a very beer way from a great source. • The Nigeria theory is not from a good source, it doesn’t explain the role strain, it does not have a theoretical contribution it’s contribution to the practice. The comments are for chapter one (previously uploaded) and chapter two (just uploaded) Take it as very seriously, please.
Furthermore, I’m uploading a new file, “Chapter 2 June feedback,” with all the comments. Please use track changes or highlight what has been changed to avoid miscommunication or misunderstanding.
OTHER: Below are all the comments:
– Creating the Argument, not just presenting the study. It must be more critical than presenting the LR.
– Has the government agreed, not agreed, been articulated by the government or not? Which one sits to gather and wishes one is different
– Is there something that has not been picked up from the LR
– Within the summary, the study attempts to solve the issues.
– grouping the abstracts.
– find an alternative for the Nigeria study to support your theory
– The themes must be reviewed or deleted; it might be as follows:
* Building female nurse workforce for Saudi Arabia – Challenges for Government
* Attraction
* Retention
Gaps in Previous Research: You must mention gaps that have not been addressed in SAUDI; gaps overall must be stronger and clearer. “Therefore, in the interests of bridging knowledge gap and provide practical insights the current study viz., Building Female Nursing Workforce for Saudi Arabia is initiated by the Scholar. “this doesn’t make sense for the panel
Research Questions don’t go together. It might be more into attraction, retention, and recommendations, for example:
Q1 Leading into overall governmental policy review?
Q2 What supports attraction?
Q3 What are the key factors for retention, or what supports retention?
I’m also attaching chapter 1 & 3 to be aligned
