You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric Criteria
Assessment
Criteria Description
Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient.
5. Target
18 points
Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient is thorough.
4. Acceptable
16.02 points
Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient, is detailed.
3. Approaching
14.22 points
Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient is present.
2. Insufficient
13.5 points
Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Summary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient is omitted.
Diagnosis: Part 1
Criteria Description
Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient.
5. Target
9 points
Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient is thorough.
4. Acceptable
8.01 points
Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient is detailed.
3. Approaching
7.11 points
Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient is present.
2. Insufficient
6.75 points
Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Determination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient is omitted.
Diagnosis: Part 2
Criteria Description
Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components.
5. Target
9 points
Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components is thorough.
4. Acceptable
8.01 points
Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components is detailed.
3. Approaching
7.11 points
Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components is present.
2. Insufficient
6.75 points
Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Definition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components is omitted.
Planning: Part 1
Criteria Description
Creation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and needs.
5. Target
8 points
Creation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and needs is thorough.
4. Acceptable
7.12 points
Creation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and needs, is detailed.
3. Approaching
6.32 points
Creation of plan of care for patient taking into account their health problems and needs is present.
2. Insufficient
6 points
Creation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and needs is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Creation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and needs is omitted.
Planning: Part 2
Criteria Description
Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion.
5. Target
8 points
Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion is thorough.
4. Acceptable
7.12 points
Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion, is detailed.
3. Approaching
6.32 points
Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion is present.
2. Insufficient
6 points
Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Description of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion is omitted.
Planning: Part 3
Criteria Description
Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components.
5. Target
8 points
Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components is thorough.
4. Acceptable
7.12 points
Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components is detailed.
3. Approaching
6.32 points
Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components is present.
2. Insufficient
6 points
Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Provision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components is omitted.
Planning: Part 4
Criteria Description
Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care.
5. Target
8 points
Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is thorough.
4. Acceptable
7.12 points
Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is detailed.
3. Approaching
6.32 points
Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is present.
2. Insufficient
6 points
Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is omitted.
Implementation
Criteria Description
Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care
5. Target
11 points
Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is thorough.
4. Acceptable
9.79 points
Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is detailed.
3. Approaching
8.69 points
Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is present.
2. Insufficient
8.25 points
Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is omitted.
Evaluation
Criteria Description
Explanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective.
5. Target
11 points
Explanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective is thorough.
4. Acceptable
9.79 points
Explanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective is detailed.
3. Approaching
8.69 points
Explanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective is present.
2. Insufficient
8.25 points
Explanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Explanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective is omitted.
Mechanics of Writing
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target
5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
4.45 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
3.95 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
3.75 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target
5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable
4.45 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
3.95 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient
3.75 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total100 points
