HAS TO BE DONE ON POWERPOINT! PUT THEM IN SLIDES!The narrated power point presentation you have created for your approved research study is due by 11:59pm, May 5th.
The goal is to effectively communicate the sociological study which will require you to clearly break down the different sections of the study and use visual or other aids to help the audience understand. Please keep in mind that your audience has not had any exposure to the study and you have to provide the context. Remember that you are essentially taking academic writing and translating it into your own words. Anything else could be considered plagiarism and would negatively affect your grade.
There is no slide number minimum or maximum. Your slides must be accompanied by a narrated presentation. Make sure to limit the number of bullets and words on each slide. Avoid using quotes and be sure to include the citation for the research study. Be creative and make it visually appealing.
At minimum, your presentation should address:
The purpose of the research. What was the research question or hypothesis?
Literature Review: What do sociologists already know about the topic?
What are the unanswered questions?
Who participated? How was the study conducted?
What were the results?
What were the key findings from the study?
What can we do with the results? How does this research impact our daily lives?
THIS IS THE RESEARCH ARTICLE
Research Article Summary
The research objective was manifold and intended to explore the intricate aspects and barriers associated with translating social research findings into policy recommendations (Rudnicki & Katarzyna Wojnicka, 2024). It was meant to study the methods, frameworks, and decision-making tools used for European Commission project proposals focused on the complexities of men’s commitment towards gender equality in the European Union. Examining the challenges, the researcher attempts to find the elements that require improvements, which will make the ideology of the research and policy recommendations fit the social problems and improve their effectiveness.
The study aimed to address the need for systematization, frameworks and approaches for formulating, verifying, and communicating policy decisions based on the available social research. The key objective was to address the setbacks of researchers and policymakers that make it challenging to transform the results of studies into workable guidelines for making policies or practical applications of knowledge. The research was focused on bringing these difficulties to attention to underscore the role of methodological rigor, plainness, and reflexivity in shaping research outcomes into pragmatic policies that can address existing societal issues.
The research involved different participants, including sociologists and experts from other disciplines who are part of the EU gender equality initiative (in R. and Katarzyna W., 2024). This mixed group in which project management is in charge of the whole execution, reporting that edits and makes the report comprehensive, advisory board members that offer strategic guidance, national experts that add localized insights, research-policy transfer experts that bridge research and applied implications, and academics who have expertise in sociology and related fields whose knowledge is added. The participants’ diversity or composition was a plus to the study since the synergy of many perspectives and expertise best suits the complex social matters and policy recommendations.
The research employed a carefully designed methodology that effectively gathered data. This included using Zoom to interview experts and then exploring the project from its start to its current state. These interviews were the most insightful part and revealed the complex process of creating policy recommendations, the issues encountered, and the significance of the project deliverables. Also, data collection encompassed the detailed study of the final project report, working documents, and earlier versions of the report, which served as an all-encompassing view of the research process and results. Using such a multi-faceted approach ensures a thorough analysis of the study as well as the depth and validity of the findings.
The study results were evident, and several barriers were seen in translating social research into policy recommendations. These problems embraced an imbalance between descriptive and prescriptive knowledge, a vagueness of recommendations and structure, a need for more links between research findings and recommendations, and an application of heuristic reasoning (Rudnicki & Katarzyna Wojnicka, 2024). The study’s merit resides in its critical analysis of the challenges mentioned above, which, among others, leads to more structured frameworks, methodological rigor, and transparency in developing research-based policy recommendations. It recognizes the necessity of reflexivity and accepts many difficulties in transferring research outcomes into practical policy measures. This adds to a deeper perception of this process and positive input into policy-oriented sociological studies.
References
Rudnicki, S., & Katarzyna Wojnicka. (2024). Leaping the Abyss: The Problematic Translation of Social Research Results into Policy Recommendations. Sociological Research Online. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804241228688
